Value |
Category |
. |
|
23.2 THE RESPONDENT MENTIONED THREE OTHER CHILDREN WHOM HE FOUND HIS SECOND WIFE WITH BUT AFTER A SHORT STAY WITH THE BIOLOGICAL FATHER TOOK THEM AWAY.HE THEREFORE HAS 7 CHILDREN OF HIS OWN (BIOLOGICAL) |
|
A VERY COOPERATIVE RESPONDENT |
|
AFTER SDEVERAL ATEMPTS TO CAPURE THIS RESPONDENT I DECIDED TO VISIT HIM AT NIGHT AND I HAD TO HIRE A PERSON TO OFFER ME SECURITY AS THIS IS A VERY INSECURE AREA. |
|
AFTER THE INTERVIEW THE RESPONDENT COMPLAINED ABOUT THE LENGTH OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE SAYING IT WAS TOO LONG AND THAT IF SHE KNEW IT WAS THAT LONG SHE WOULD HAVE ACCEPTED TO TAKE PART IN IT, AS IT WASTED HER VALUABLE TIME. |
|
AGES OF THE CHILDREN ARE VERY DIFFICULT FOR THE RESPONDENT TO RECALL OR REMEMBER |
|
ALTHOUGH THE RESPONDENT HAD TO CALL HIS FELLOW MAASAI FRIENDS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE INTERVIEW HE WAS QUITE CO-OPERATIVE |
|
ALTHOUGH THE RESPONDENT WAS ATTENTIVE AND COOPERATIVE HE LATER COMPLAINED ABOUT THE LENGTH OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE SUGGESTING THAT IT SHOULD BE REDUCE TO A RATHER SHORTER ONE AS IT WOULD INCONVINIENCE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE BUSY |
|
ALTHOUGH THE RESPONDENT WAS COOPERATIVE AND PATIENT, HE COMPLAINED THAT THE QUESTIONNAIRE WAS TOO LONG AND THAT IN FUTURE THE CENTRE SHOULD DESIGN RATHER A SHORTER ONE |
|
ALTHOUGH THE RESPONDENT WAS COOPERATIVE HE PARTICIPATED IN THE INTERVIEW JUST TO KNOW WHAT KIND OF QUESTIONS WE HAD THIS TIME ROUND |
|
AS THE INTERVIEW WAS GOING ON SHE WAS WASHING THE BOTTLES FOR SALES SHE ALSO WAS REALLY CONCERNED IF THE PROJECRT CAN OFFER FREE MEDICAL CAMP FOR THEM. SHE HAD A LOT OF STORIES |
|
AT FIRST IT WAS A REFUSAL FROM THE OTHER INTERVIEW BUT AFTER TALKING TO HIM FOR ABOUT 30MIN HE ACCEPTED TO BE INTERVIEWED |
|
AT FIRST HE WAS HARSH-HE HAD BEEN QUESTIONED FOR MANY YEARS AND NO BENEFIT IS FORTH COMING. I EXPLAINED TO HIM SO MUCH TILL I CONVINCED HIM. HE ACCEPTED, BUT THEN TO SOME DEGREE HE WAS NOT COOPERATING. I TOOK NORMAL TIME WITH HIM TILL THE END O |
|
AT FIRST THE RESPONDENT RELATIVES REFUSED FOR THE RESPONDENT TO BE INTERVIEWED BUT AFTER A EXPLANATION OF THE MAIN OBJECTIVE,THEY GAVE IN BUT IN CONDITION THAT I WOULD NOT GO BACK TO THEIR HOME. |
|
AT THE INTRODUCTION WHEN CALLING THE ORGANIZATIONS AT WHICH TO TAKE THE CONCERNED CONCERNING THE AGED PROBLEMS ON THE MENTION OF GOVT. HE REALLY COMPLAINED OF WHAT THE CUTRRENTLY IS HAPPENING IN MATHARE. THUS DURING THE WHOLE INTERVIEW SHE WAS |
|
AT THE TIME OF INTERVIEW RESPONDENTS CHILDREN WERE AT HOME . NOTICED THAT THE FIRST BORN SON WAS RETARERED |
|
AT THE TIME OF INTERVIEW THE RESPONDENT WAS UNWELL |
|
BENJAMIN STAYS ALONE IN NAIROBI WHILE THE OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS ARE UPCOUNTRY. HE THEREFORE HAS NO HELPER HERE IN NAIROBI |
|
BROKE HIS HAND IN AN ACCIDENT 4 MONTHES AGO |
|
CAN THE ORGANIZATION DO ANYTHING TO OFFER HEALTH ASSISTANCE TO THE WOMAN. SHE SEEMS TO HAVE PAIN IN THE JOINTS OF LEGS AND ARMS. SHE IS VERY COOPERATIVE |
|
CANT REMEMBER SOME OF THE CHILDREN CHISTIANS NAMES |
|
CANT REMEMBER THE DATES OF BIRTH |
|
CHECK ON Q11.4 (IF 2 OR 3 SKIP TO 11.5 |
|
CHILD 1 AND CHILD 8 WERE BORN THE SAME YEAR BUT ONE DIED |
|
CHILD 10 AND 13 DIED WHEN THEY WERE SOME MONTHS OLD HENCE Q 3.12=2.13 DON'T APPLY |
|
CHILDREN ARE NOT MENTIONED BY PARENT |
|
CHILDREN ARE STAYING UPCOUNTRY. THE FATHER DID NOT WANT TO MENTION THEM SAYING IT'S OF NO HELP TO HIM |
|
CHILDREN NAMES, NOT MENTIONED. HE SAID ITS OF BENEFIT TO HIM |
|
CHILDREN NOT MENTIONED BY THE MOTHER |
|
COMMUNICATING WAS A LITTLE BIT PROBLEM BECAUSE I HAD TO REPEAT MYSELF SEVERAL TIMES |
|
COMPLAINED ABOUT MY ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT HER DEAD CHILDREN |
|
CONTINUED WITH THE INTERVIEW AFTER HE CAME FROM THE MOSQUE FOR PRAYERS |
|
COOPERATIVE RESPONDENT |
|
COSMAS DIVORCED HIS FIRST WIFE IN 1971. COSMAS MARRIED HIS SECOND WIFE IN 1973. BUT THE WIFE HAD A CHILD IN 1971 DURING THE TIME THEY WERE STILL FRIENDS |
|
DESPITE BEING A CRIPPLE THE WOMAN IS VERY NICE TO PEOPLE |
|
DIVORCED LONG TIME AGO THEREFORE DOE NOT KNOW THE WHEREABOUT OF CHILDREN AND WIFE. |
|
DOES IT HAVY ANY HELP. THIS RESEACRH? THE RESPONDENT TOLD ME TO ANSWER THAT QUESTIONS NEXT TIME WE MEET |
|
DONE AFTER A REFUSAL |
|
DUE TO INAVAILABILITY OF THE RESPONDENT PARTLY IN THE MORNING AND COMES BACK LATE IN THE EVENING I HAD TO CONDUCT THIS INTERVIEW AT NIGHT |
|
DUE TO THE AGE OF THE RESPONDENT, HE KEPT ON LOOSING TRACK ON ISSUES DISCUSSED AND HE DIDNT UNDERSTAND VIRTUALLY THE WHOLE QUESTIONNAIRE WHICH NEEDED LOTS OF PATIENCE FROM ME AND UNDERSTANDING. WE ALSO HAD TO TAKE BREAKS OFF SO AS TO KEEP THE I |
|
DUE TO THE RESPONDENT BEING QUIET ELDERLY I TOOK MUCH TIME EXPLAINING TO THE RESPONDENT IN VENACULAR AND ACTUALLY MAKING HIM UNDERSTAND BUT HE WAS VERY PATIENT |
|
DURING THE WHOLE INTERVIEW HE WAS SAYING HE IS SUFFERING IF I CAN HELP IN ANYWAY ESPECIALLY MEDICINE |
|
ELIZABETH, THE CHILD THAT SHE TAKES CARE OF SAID SHE WAS TIRED OF THE QUESTIONS THAT WE USUALLY ASK HER |
|
EXPLANATION ON Q 11.6 RESPODENT IS AN UNTRAINED BIRTH ATTENDANT (TBA). SHE USUALLY GOES FOR HIV TESTING EVERY 3 MONTHS |
|
FAIR |
|
FATHER DID NOT MENTION ALL HIS CHILDREN. HE SAID IT S OF NO HELP |
|
FATHER DID NOT MENTION THE REST OF HIS CHILDREN |
|
FATHER REFUSED TO NAME HIS CHILDREN |
|
FIST PART TOO NORMAL TIME NO PROBLEM WITH LANGUAGE BARRIERS.VIGNETTE TOOK MORE TIME TO RESPONDENDTO UNDERSTAND QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS GIVEN |
|
FOR Q3.8 AND 3.11 SHE SAID THAT SHE DOESN'T KNOW AND REMEMBER THE DATES OF BIRTH FOR 3.11 SHE SAID SHE SEES THAM ONCE IN A WHILE BUT DONT KNOW HOW MANY KIDS THEY HAVE. AT FIRST SHE DIDNT WANT ME TO ASK HER ANY QUESTIONS BUT AFTER 15 MINUTES SHE |
|
FOUND DIFFICULT IN FINDING THE STRUCTURE. |
|
FOUND THE RESPONDENT IN A CAMPAIGN MEETING. |
|
FRESPONDENT WAS WELCOMING BUT NEEDS SUPPORT FROM THE NGOS IN THE SLUM BECAUSE HE SUGGESTS THE NGOS BENEFIT FROM RESPONDENTS |
|
FROM MY OBSERVATION THE RESPONDENT SEEMS TO BE THE LANDLORD OF THE STRUCTURE AND THATS WHY THE CHILDREN LIVE WITHIN BUT NOT IN THE SAME HOUSEHOLD |
|
GOOD |
|
GOOD AND WELCOMING TOOK NORMAL TIME WITH HIM |
|
GOOD AND WELCOMING. I TOOK MORE TIME BECAUSE HE COULDNT COMPREHEND QUESTIONS QUICKLY ESPECIALLY THE VIGNETTE . |
|
GOOD WELCOMING TOOK NORMAL TIME |
|
GOT AN ACCIDENT IN 1981 AND RIGHT HAND WAS PARALYSED. SURVIVES FROM RENT FROM HIS MOTHERS PLOTS. |
|
HAD AN APPOINTMENT WITH THE RESPONDENT SO I HAD TO WAKE UP TOO EARLY. |
|
HE 8 CHILDREN FROM TWO WIVES BUT REFUSED TO MENTION ALL OF THEM |
|
HE ACCEPTED AT FIRST COMPAINED VERY MUCH OF BEING INTERVIED EVERYTIME AND THEN BECAUSE THERE IS NO ASSISTANCE. I TOOK A LOT OF TIME TALIKNG BEFORE I STARTED MY INTERVIEW( ITOOK ALOT OF TIME BEFORE ACCEPTING) |
|
HE AT FIRST THOUGHT I WAS A SOCIAL WORKER, THE WIFE IS MAD AND DOES NOT KNOW WHERE SHE LIVES |
|
HE BELIEVED THAT AFTER ASKING ALL THE QUESTIONS THEIR WOULD BE SOME HELP ESPECIALLY WITH TAKING CARE OF GRANDCHILDREN AND HOPED THE SON IN LAW WHO BRUTALLY BEAT THE WIFE AND KIDS WOULD BE PUNISHED AND MADE TO TAKE OF THE CHILDREN OTHER THAN HIM |
|
HE BELIEVES ONE DAY THE RESEARCH WILL COME TO AN END AND THE BENEFITS BE SEEN |
|
HE COMPLAINED ON MANY QUESTIONS |
|
HE DOES NOT BELIEVE IN GOING TO HOSPITAL |
|
HE DOESNT REMEMBER THE DATES WHEN HIS CHILDREN WERE BORN |
|
HE HAD REFUSED THE FIRST ROUND |
|
HE HAD TWO WIVES BUT ONE OF THEM DIED. HE IS REMAINING WITH ONE WIFE. SOME CHILDREN HAVE ALMOST SAME DATE OF BIRTHS |
|
HE HAS CHRONIC LUNG DISEASES MADE WORSE BY HIS DRINKING HABITS AND SMOKING. HE WAS DIAGNOSED WITH TB 6 MONTHS AGO AND PUT ON MEDICATION BUT HAS NOT STOPPED THE HABIT OF SMOKING. HE WAS DISOWENED BY HIS CHILDREN |
|
HE HOPED HE WOULD BE HELPED BY WHAT WE ARE DOING |
|
HE KEPT ON INSISTING THAT THE POEPLE DOING RESEARCH SHOULD BRING HELP TO THEM AND PAY SOME SCHOOL FEES TO THE NEEDY AND GIVE THEIR CHILDREN JOBS |
|
HE KEPT ON INSISTING THAT THERE IS NO SECURITY AND THE ENVIRONMENT IS NOT CONDUCIVE TO THE PEOPLE LIVING THERE |
|
HE KEPT ON SAYING THAT SOME QUESTIONS ARE NOT MEANT TO BE ASKED AND THAT HE IS NOT GETTING ANYTHING |
|
HE KEPT SAYING THAT HE IS TIRED ANSWERING QUESTIONS |
|
HE REFUSED TO SAY THE AGE HE WAS WHEN HE STARTED LIVING WITH THE WIFE AND SAID IT WAS PERSONAL |
|
HE SAID HE WILL BE WAITING TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS NEXT IN FUTURE |
|
HE WANTED TO BE QUESTIONED ABOUT HIS PROBLEM WHICH ICLUDES HEALTH, FINANCIAL CRISIS AND JOB MATTERS.. HE QUESTIONED THE BENEFIT OF THE INTERVIEWS. |
|
HE WAS A BIT RELUCTANT TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONNAIRE BUT AFTER EXPLAINING TO HIM THE MEANING OF IT HE STARTED ANSWERING BUT AFTER SOME TIMES HE STARTED LIKE THESE QUESTIONS WERE TOO MUCH PERSONAL BUT HUMBLED UNTIL HE ACCEPTED TO CONTINUE. |
|
HE WAS BUSY BUT HE LET ME ASK HIM QUESTIONS I.E. CHOPPING POTATOES. HE WAS COOPERATIVE BUT SAID THOSE ARE TOO MANY QUESTIONS WE ARE ASKING AND THEY DONT GET ANY HELP |
|
HE WAS DIFFICULT AT FIRST BECAUSE SOMEBODY HAD GONE GONE AT FIRST AND HE REFUSED WAS STILL IN BAD MOOD. |
|
HE WAS DIFFICULT TO HANDLE.HE SAID HE HAD GIVEN THE SAME INFORMATION ANOTHER TIME. HE SAID HE COULD NOT COUNT HIS CHILDREN BECAUSE IT IS A BAD OMEN. |
|
HE WAS GOOD AND GRATEFUL FOR MY VISIT.CONVERSANT WITH SWAHILITOOK NORMAL TIME WITH THE QUESTIONAIRE BUT MORE TIME WITH THE VIGNETTE |
|
HE WAS GOOD AND WELLCOMING TOO.- TOOK NORNAL TIME WITH HIM, GIVEN US THOSE CHANCE (OPPORTUNITY TO INTERVIEW) BUT ON THE HAND STRECHED THAT WE SHOULD DO SOMETHING MORE THAT WE DO TO THE COMMUNITY EG 3 DAY FREE MEDICAL CAMPS CARE FOR THOSE WHO NE |
|
HE WAS GOOD WILLING TO BE INTERVIEWED WITHOUT A PROBLEM. |
|
HE WAS GOOD. HIS ACCURACY WAS VERY LOW CANNOT REMEMBER MONTH AND YEARS- I TOOK LONG TIME WITH HIM BECAUSE HIS COMPREHENSION FOR THE ISSUE DISCUSSED WEAS VERY LOW. OTHERWISE HE WAS GRATEFUL FOR MY VISIT |
|
HE WAS HAPPY ATLEAST WE ARE TRYING TO HELP THEM OUT BY GETTING SOME OF THE CRUCIAL INFORMATION |
|
HE WAS HARSH AT FIRST, BUT I TALKED HIM AND HE UNDERSTOOD THE NECCESITY OF THIS INTERIVEW. |
|
HE WAS OPEN ABOUT HIS SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR |
|
HE WAS READY TO BE ASKED QUESTIONS AND COOPERATIVE |
|
HE WAS READY TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION |
|
HE WAS SAYING SOME QUESTIONS WERE TOO PERSONAL BECAUSE THEY SEE IT TAKES TIME TO SEE THE BENEFIT E.G Q 2.6 AND 4.3 AND 4.5 |
|
HE WAS SOMEHOW HARSH. THROUGH STORIES HE ACCEPTED THE INTERVIEW |
|
HE WAS VERY WELLCOMING |
|
HE WAS VERY WELLCOMING AND READY FOR THE INTERVIEW. TOOK NORMAL TIME WITH HIM( THE QUESTIONNAIER PART). BUT TOOK MORE TIME FOR THE VIGNETTE PART, TOOK HIM SOMETIMES TO UNDERSTAND THE QUESTIONS AND GIVING OUT ANSWER . THE QUESTIONS WERE SO MUCH |
|
HE WAS WELCOMING. VERY GRATEFUL FOR MY VISIT. I JUST TOOK NORMAL TIME WITH HIM |
|
HE WAS WILLING TO GIVE ALL THE INFORMATION NEEDED DESPITE BEING EMBARASSED BECAUSE I ASKED ABOUT HIV/AIDS |
|
HE WAS WILLING TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION REQUIRED SAYING THAT WE SHOULD NOT FORGET HIM WHEN HELP COMES BECAUSE HE DOESNT HAVE A JOB |
|
HE WAS WILLING TO GIVE INFORMATION |
|
HE WAS WILLING TO GIVE INFORMATION AND HOPED TO BE HELPED AND THE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TOO LONG |
|
HE WAS WILLING TO GIVE INFORMATION BU HE COMPLAINED OF NOT HAVING A JOB AS MUCH AS HE TRIED DONT HAVE MONEY TO SUPPORT CHILDREN, FOOD AND PAY RENT. HE HOPED AFTER ASKING ALL THA SOME HELP WILL BE AVAILABLE IN ORDER TO CHANGE HE'S LIFE BECAUSE |
|
HE WAS WILLING TO GIVE INFORMATION BUT HE SAID THIS TIME THE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TOO LONG |
|
HE WAS WILLING TO GIVE INFORMATION EVEN WHAT IS NOT REQUIRED. HE SAID THE CHILDREN 7 AND 8 DIED AS THEY WERE ABOUT TO BE GIVEN BIRTH SO THEY DID NOT HAVE NAMES. |
|
HE WAS WILLING TO GIVE MORE INFORMATION THAN EXPECTED SO LONG AS WE ARE THERE TO HELP |
|
HE WAS WILLING TOGIVE ALL THE INFORMATION REQUIRED |
|
HES GOOD AND VERY WELCOMING-HE WAS SLOW BUT THEN I MANAGED TO CATCH UP WITH TIME (TOOK NORMAL TIME)-CONCERNING THE DATES MONTHS AND YEARS HIS ACCURACY WAS LOW BUT ASSIST BY DAUGHTER TO GIVE THE DATES OF BIRTHS FOR ALL THE CHILDREN AND MARK TIME |
|
HEZRON DID NOT MENTION THE NAMES OF HIS 3 CHILDREN WHO DIED. HE SAID HE DOES NOT WANT TO TALK ABOUT THEM |
|
HIS WIFE WAS HARSH AND REFUSED SHE ALSO CONVINCED HIM. I TOOK SOMETIME TO EXPLAIN TO HIM HE LATER ACCEPTED. HIS WIFES QUESTIONAIRE WS REFUSAL BUT I WAS LUCKY T CONVINCE HER HUSBAND |
|
HOPE NEXT TIME I VISIT HIM WILL BRING HIM SOMETHING |
|
HUSBAND OF LOYCE MULUKI DIED IN 2004 AND SHE DOES NOT WANT TO BE MARRIED AGAIN |
|
I CAPTURED THE RESPONDENT INA NEW LOCATION ID. |
|
I DID THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WITH ALOT OF PROBLEMS AS I DID IT IN THE RAIN. MY RESPONDENT STOOD AT THE DOOR AND FAILED TO USHER ME IN HER HOUSE. THIS WAS A SIGN OF TELLING ME HURRY UP AND GO |
|
I DIDNT FIND THE RESPONDENT IN THE LOCATION INDICATED ON THE IDENTIFICATION FORM HE HAD MOVED TO Y064019007 |
|
I DONT THINK THE RESPONDENT WAS ADEQUATELY COOPERATIVE AND I THOUGHT HE ANSWERED BECAUSE HE DIDNT WANT TO SEND ME AWAY THIS SOME QUESTION ESPECIALLY SECTION 7 WERE ANSWERED RANDOMLY WITHOUT HIM TAKING TIME TO THINK ABOUT THEM. |
|
I HAD A HARD TIME COLLECTING THIS DATA FROM THE RESPODENT. HE SAID HE WASNT GOING TO ANSWER MORE QUESTIONS RELATING TO APHRC |
|
I HAD TO BE SLO BECAUSE SHE COULDNT HEAR SOME WORDS SO I HAD TO ELABORATE FURTHER |
|
I HAD TO TAKE ALOT OF TIME BECAUSE OF ASKING ABOUT ALL 19 CHILDREN. HE SAID HE CANT KNOW WHO IS FOLLOWING WHO EXACTLY BUT HE TRIED |
|
I HAD TO TAKE TIME WRITING ALL THE DETAILS ABOUT THE CHILDREN AND HE WAS COOPERATIVE |
|
I HAD TO WAKE UP EARLY IN THE MORNING COZ RESPONDENT IS ONLY AVAILABLE AT THAT TIME. |
|
I INTERVIEWED THIS LADY AT NIGHT AS SHE LIVES VERY EARLY IN THE MORNING AND COMES BACK LATE IN THE EVENING |
|
I REALISED THAT SHE COULD NOT REMEMBER THE YEAR OF THE HUSBANDS DEATH AND SAID THAT IT WAS A LONG TIME AGO. EVEN THE CHILDREN SHE CANT REMEMBER THE YAER THEY WERE BORN |
|
I THINK IN THE QUESTION WHERE BY YOU ARE ASKING HOW MUCH DOES RESPONDENT GIVE TO THE CHILDREN IN TERMS OF MONEY YOU SHOULD ALSO HAVE A QUESTION ASKING ABOUT THEIR MONTHLY INCOME. |
|
I TOOK ALOT OF TIME TO READ AND REREAD THE VIGNETTE |
|
I WAS SLOW IN MY INTERVIEW BECAUSE SHE COULD NOT UNDERSTAND SOME KISWAHILI WORDS. HER DAUGHTER HELPED ME TO TRANSLATE |
|
I WAS THREATENED TO BE RAPED |
|
IF THE PERSON CAN GET ANY ASSISTANCE CONCERNING HEALTH PROBLEMS (THE TEETH) BECAUSE SOMETIMES THEY ACHE. IF THERE'S ANY HELP IN PROVISION OF CHILDREN'S FOOD AND CLOTHING |
|
IF THE RESPONDENT HAS NO MAJOR ILLNESS (18) THERE SHOULD BE A SKIP TO SECTION 7 I.E 7.1 SECTION 4 TWO BOSES SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR Q4.5 THAT IS FOR THE MONTHS SECTION 5 ONE BOX SHOULD BE PROVIDED SECTION 10 IF ANSWER TO 10.2 IS SELF THERE SH |
|
IN 3.2 THE CHILD DIED DURING CHILD BIRTH SO IT HAD NO NAME |
|
IN 3.3,THE RESPONDENT SAID HE DID HAVE BIOLOGICAL KIDS |
|
IN 5.0 THE RESPONDENT IS SOMEBODY WHO BEGS FROM WELLWISHERS THAT PAY HER RENT, FOOD AND OTHER (SAVINGS). SHE DOES IT ON A DAILY AND SPECIFIC TIMES . IT WAS VERY MUCH DIFFICULT TO THE RESPONDENT TO SPECIFY THE DATES AND MONTHS AS WELL |
|
IN Q 3.5 TO 3.18 RESPONDENT REFUSED TO GIVE THE NAMES OF HIS CHILDREN |
|
IN QUESTION 1.4,CONCERNING RESPONDENTS DATE OF BIRTH,HE SAYS THAT HIS ACTUAL YEAR OF BIRTH IS 1946 AND NOT 1949 |
|
IN QUESTION 3.13 THE RESPONDNET NOWDAYS SPENDS MOST OF THE TIME UPCOUNTRY |
|
IN SECTION 2 RESPONDENT HAS NEVER BEEN MARRIED BUT SHE GOT THE CHILDREN OUTSIDE MARRIAGE |
|
INTERVIEW FAIR |
|
INTERVIEW WAS A BIT HARD COZ THE RESPONDENT THOUGHT OF GAINING MATERIAL AFTER THE INTERVIEW BUT I TRIED TO EXPLAIN EVEN AFTER THE INTERVIEW |
|
INTERVIEW WAS BEING ANSWERED FROM A RELIGIOUS POINT OF VIEW. THE RESPONDENT PUT GOD IN EVERY QUESTIONS AND EVEN QUOTED SOME BIBLE VERSES TO QUESTIONS LIKE THOSE REGARDING HIV/AIDS |
|
INTERVIEW WAS FAIR |
|
INTERVIEW WAS FAIR, ALTHOUGH THE RESPONDENT WAS HESISTANT AT FIRST, SHE EVEN SAID THAT ITS HER WHO INSTRUCTED HER NEIGHBOURS NOT TELL OF WHERE SHE HAD MIGRATED TO, BUT SHE SAID EVEN NOW ITS JUST BECAUSE I LOOKED FAMILIAR AND THAT SHE EVEN HERSE |
|
INTERVIEW WAS FAIR. |
|
INTERVIEW WAS FAIR.RESPONDENT WAS BED RIDDEN AND I INVITED THE AREA COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER WHO CALLED THE NURSE AND TREATED ONE DAY BEFORE THE INTERVIEW |
|
INTERVIEW WAS GOOD |
|
INTERVIEW WAS OK |
|
INTERVIEW WAS OKEY |
|
INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL BUT THE RESPONDENT COMPLAINT OF SEVERAL INTERVIEWS WITHOUT BENEFITS. |
|
IT LOOK LONG TO CONVINCE THIS RESPONDENT SINCE HE WAS CLAIMING THAT HE HAS BEEN ANSWERING MANY QUESTIONS FROM THE DSS PEOPLE |
|
IT REACHED A POINT I COULDNT UNDERSTAND HIM BUT HIS WIFE DID HELP ME. GENERALLY WAS WILLING TO GIVE FULL RESPONSE |
|
IT REACHED A POINT IT WAS DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND THE RESPODENT BECAUSE A BROTHER CAME IN AND HE INTEFERED WITH THE INTERVIEW , RESPONDING TO EVERY QUESTION THE INTERVIEW ASKED EVEN BEFORE THE RESPONDENT COULD ANSWER HIMSELF. HE WAS TELLING THE |
|
IT REACHED SOME POINT SHE COULD NOT UNDERSTAND SOME WORDS SO THE DAUGHTER DECIDED TOEXPLAIN IN THEIR LANGUAGE. I HAD TO READ SLOWLY AND REPEAT MY SELF FOR TO UNDERSTAND . SHE COMPLAINED THE QUESTIONNAIRE WAS TOO LONG. FOR THE DATES OF BIRTH |
|
IT TOOK HER SOME TIME TO UNDERSTAND THE VIGNETTES FORM AND WE HAD TO KEEP ON REPEATING |
|
IT WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO FIND THE RESPONDENT AT HIS LOCATION.THIS TOOK ALMOST THREE WEEKS AFTER WHICH I FOUND HIM AND DID THE INTERVIEW. HE CLAIMED THAT THEY DONT BENEFIT FROM THE ANSWERS THEY GIVE AND THAT IT WAS A WASTE OF TIME AND ENERGY |
|
IT WAS VERY SUCCESSFUL |
|
ITS THE RESPONDENT'S WIFE WHO SUFFERS FROM HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE. |
|
JOSHUA MULI SAYS HE HAS 5 CHILDREN BUT REFUSED TO MENTION THEIR NAMES |
|
LATELY WE'VE BEEN ASKING TOO MANY QUESTIONS YOU CANT KNOW WHICH IS WHICH. HE WAS EVEN PREPARED TO BE ASKED THE QUESTIONS. THE PROBLEM IS THAT IF THEY WILL GET HELP!!! |
|
MARGARET IS IN BOARDING SECONDARY SCHOOL AND OCCASIONALLY COMES HOME |
|
MARGARET WANJIRU WAS BORN AFTER THEY HAD SEPARETED |
|
MOSES SIMIYU EXITED FROM V007036005 AND NOW CURRENTLY IN V007037004 WITH HIS WIFE. MOSES FEELS PAIN SOMETIMES DUE TO INJURIES SUSTAINED IN ROAD ACCIDENT AS THE VEHICLE HE BOAD ROLLED 10 YEARS AGO. RESPONDEND FAILED TO MENTION THEOTHER 2 NAMES |
|
MY RESPONDENT DIDN'T TALK ABOUT HIS DECEASED CHILD. HE HAS 10 CHILDREN ONE OF WHOM IS DEAD, WHO HE WASN'T WILLING TO DISCUSS. HE TOLD HE HAS 10 KIDS BUT WILL ONLY DISCUSS 6, I CONVINCED HIM. HE DID NOT WANT TO TALK OF HIS MARRIED CHILDREN EITHE |
|
MY RESPONDENT WASNT SURE OF WHERE HE COMES FROM ON LOCATION AND SUB LOCATION |
|
N/A |
|
NEXT TIME THE PERSON 2B TREATED AS AN OUTMIGRANT TO REUBEN. (NON DSA SLUM) |
|
NIL |
|
NO |
|
NO QUESTIONS TO ASK. QN10.2 AND 10.4 SHE SAID SHE HAS NO CLOSE FRIENDS BUT THE ONLY CLOSE FRIENDS ARE HER CHILDREN |
|
NON |
|
NONE |
|
OK |
|
OKAY |
|
OKEY |
|
ON THE FIRST MENTION, HE SAID HE HAD TWO NON-BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN BUT ON PROBING FOUND OUT THAT THE OTHER WAS LEFT WITH THEIR FATHER NON-BIOLOGICAL IS BELOW 12 YRS AND HE NOT SURE WHEN SHE AS BORN BUT IN CLASS 1 |
|
ONE OF HER LEG IS DISABLED |
|
ONLY FIVE CHILDREN WERE INDICATED BY THE FIELDWORKER. |
|
PARENT DID NOT MANTAIN HIS OTHER TWO OLDER CHILDREN |
|
PARENT DID NOT MENTION HIS CHILDREN |
|
PARENTS DID NOTE MENTION THE NAMES OF HER OTHER SIX CHILDREN SAYING SHE DOES NOT WANT TO TALK ABOUT THEM. BUT SAID THEY ARE ALL MARRIED |
|
PINPOINTED THAT THE RESEARCH IS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOP MENT AND FOR US TO DO IT SO NOT JUST RESEARCH.ON THE PART OF VIGNETTES SHE UNDERSTOOD WELL AND ANSWERS FORTHCOMING |
|
PRIVATE AND COOPERATIVE |
|
Q 3.8 CHILD 1 AND 2 RESPONNDENT DOESN'T KNOW THE MONTHS OF BIRTH |
|
Q 3.8 THE RESPONDENT SAID ON THE QUESTION ABOUT THE BIRTHS OF THE CHILDREN AND DATES ITS ONLY THE MOTHER WHO CAN ANSWER. |
|
Q 9.6 THE RESPONDENT DOES NOT LIVE WITH THE SISTER'S CHILDREN IN KOROGOCHO BUT ITS THE WIFE IN THE RURAL AREAS WHO IS TAKING CARE OF THE CHILDREN. THE MOTHER OF THE CHILDREN WENT TO ANOTHER URBAN AREA IN SEARCH OF A JOB AND SHE NEVER COMES TO L |
|
Q.3.5 CHILD 10 WAS BORN IN 1986 THE RESPONDENT HAD FORGOTTEN TO MENTION THIS CHILD EARLIER.THE RESPONDENT COULD NOT REMEMBER ALL THE NAMES OF HIS NON-BILOGICAL CHILDREN |
|
Q10.1 THE RESPONDENT SAID SHE HAS NO FRIENDS Q10.15 THE ANSWER IS DONT KNOW Q11.15 THE RESPONDENT CANT TELL THE INTERVIEW TOOK LONG BECAUSE THE RESPONDENT WA |
|
Q10.1 THE RESPONDENT SAID THAT HE HAS MANY FRIENDS AND ALL OF THEM ARE CLOSE FRIENDS |
|
Q2.13 SAMUEL DOESN'T LIVE IN THIS HOSE BUT ANOTHER WITH HIS WIFE HE HOWEVER COMES TO THIS DAILY BECAUSE HE KEEPS PIGS AND CATTLES NEAR IT |
|
Q2.2 THE ANSWER IS BOTH 1 AND 2 |
|
Q3.8 RESPOENDENT DO'T KNOW MONTHS IN WHICH CHILD 2 3 4 6 AND 7 WERE BORN |
|
Q3.8 RESPONDENT DOESN'T KNOW WHEN THESE CHILDREN WERE BORN Q6.4.1 I FELT LIKE I WAS IRRITATING THE REPONDNET |
|
Q3.8 RESPONDENT DON'T RECALL THE MONTHS IN WHICH HIS CHILDREN WERE BORN |
|
Q5.10 THE RESPNDENT COULD NOT ESTIMATE THE NO OF HOURS SHE USED TO WORK |
|
Q6.13 THE RESPONDENT WAS OF THE VIEW THAT IF HE HAD MUCH MONEY HE COULD NOT HAVE GONE TO KENYATTA HOSPITAL AND ADMITTED FOR A MONTH, HE COULD HAVE GONE IN ANOTHER PRIVATE HOSPITAL, WHERE THE PAYMENTS ARE MUCH HIGHER FOR A CASE LIKE HIS OF INJUR |
|
Q6.2 THE RESPONDENT DID NOT KNOW THE NAME OF THE HEALTH CENTER HE VISITED |
|
Q6.7 DO NOT KNOW NAME OF HERBALIST |
|
Q6.9 THE RESPONDENT COULD NOT REMEMBER HOWMUCH SHE PAID FOR MEDICINE Q3.13 THE RESPONDENT DAID THAT CHILD 2 GOT LOST IN 1998 BUT IS SURE THAT THE CHILD IS ALIVE |
|
QN 10.2 AND 10.4 THE RESPONDENT SAID HE HAS NO CLOSE FRIENDS ALSO THE ONLY ONE FRIEND THAT HE SAID WAS NOT A CLOSE BUT A GENERAL FRIEND WHO THEY JUST PASS TIME WITH |
|
QNS 7.22 WAS NOT COMPLETED BUT I REFFERED ANOTHER. |
|
QUESITON 4.1 FOR PLACE OF ORIGIN - VERY OLD, LEFT THE AREA LONG TIME AGO. THE ANSWERS FOR (B) AND (V/E) NOT FORTHCOMING UNABLER TO RECALL) SHE DON'T KNOW. UNABLE TO GIVE THE EXACT DATES AND MONTHS (VERY MUCH UNABLE). |
|
QUESTION 2.15 RESPONDENT DOESN'T REMEMBER THE MONTHS WHEN HE GOT MARRIED |
|
QUESTION 2.15 RESPONDENT SAIDS HE CAN NOT REMEMBER THE MONTHS AND THE YEAR THEY GOT MARRIED BUT HE TOLD ME TO CONFIRM FROM WHAT THE WIFE REPORTED. QUESTION 3.8 HE CAN NOT REMEMBER THE MONTHS AND THE YEAR WHEN KEVIN AND KASIM WERE BORN |
|
QUESTION 2.15 RESPONDET DOESN'T REMEMBER THE MONTHS WHEN HE GOT MARRIED QUESTION 3.8 DOESN'T REMEMBER THE MONTHS WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE BORN |
|
QUESTION 2.15 RESPONDETS IS TOO OLD TO REMEMBER THER YEAR AND MONTHS THEY GOT MARRIED. QUESTION 3.8 RESPONDENT COMPLETELY DOES'T KNOW WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE BORN |
|
QUESTION 2.16 THE HUSBAND DIED TIME OF MAUMAU- |
|
QUESTION 3.10 AND 3.11 PETER IS STAYING IN MOMBASA AND HIS MOTHER DOESN'T KNOW WHETER SHE GOT MARRIED OR NOT BECAUSE SHE HAS TAKEN ALOT OF TIME YEARS NOT SEEING EACH OTHER |
|
QUESTION 3.12 THE NON-BIOLOGICAL CHILD IS IN JAIL |
|
QUESTION 3.5 ON THE 5TH CHILD WENT AWAY WITH THE FIRST WIFE AND HE CANNOT RECALL CHILDS NAME |
|
QUESTION 3.5 THE LAST CHILD SHOULD BE BETWEEN CHILD 4 AND 5. THE RESPONDENT HAD FORGOTTEN TO LIST THE CHILD. QUESTION 8.13 THE RESPONDENT COULD NOT EXACTLY THE NAME OF THE DISEASE (INFECTION OF THROAT GLANDS) |
|
QUESTION 3.5 THE RESPONDENT CANNOT REMEMBER THE DATE AND THE MONTHS WHICH HER CHILDREN WERE BORN |
|
QUESTION 3.8 AND 3.9 RESPODENTS DOESN'T REMEMBER WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE BORN AND EVEN DOENT REMEMBER WHEN SELA DIED AND THEY HAD NOT GIVEN HER A CHRISTIOAN NAME |
|
QUESTION 3.8 AND 3.9 RESPONDENT CAN NOT REMEMBER WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE BORN AND EVEN ANN DIED |
|
QUESTION 3.8 HE DOESNT KNOW THE MONTHS WHEN HIS GRAND CHILD WAS BORN |
|
QUESTION 3.8 REPSONDET DOEN'T COMPLETELY REMEMBER WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE BORN AN SHE JUST REMEMBERED THE MONTHS WHEN SELA DIED BUT DOES NOT REMEMBER THE YEAR |
|
QUESTION 3.8 RESPODNET REMEMBER THE MONTHS WHEN HIS CHILDREN WERE BORNAND ALSO HE DOENS'T JNOW WHEN RUTH MAGADLINE AND CAROLINE WERE BORN BECAUSE THEY ARE HIS BROTHERS CHILDREN |
|
QUESTION 3.8 RESPONDENT CAN NOT REMEMBER WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE BORN |
|
QUESTION 3.8 RESPONDENT DOESN'T KNOW THE MONTHS AND YEAR WHEN JACKLINE AND EZEKIEL WERE BORN BECAUSE THEY ARE CHILDREN TO THE BEROTHER. THE CHILDREN NAMED IN QUESTION 3.4 ARE ALL ABOVE 15 YEARS |
|
QUESTION 3.8 RESPONDENT DOESN'T RECALL THE MONTHS WHEN SOME OF THE CHILDREN WERE BORN |
|
QUESTION 3.8 RESPONDENT DON'T KNOW WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE BORN REPONDNET UNDERSTANDS AND SPEAKS KAMBA BUT I WAS HELPED BY HER DAUGHTER TO GET THIS INFORMATION |
|
QUESTION 3.8 RESPONDNET CANNOT RECALL HE MONTHS WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE BORN. MARGARET NJERI AND MARY WANJIKU SHARE THE SAME YEAR BECAUSE THEY ARE OF DIFFERENT MOTHERS |
|
QUESTION 3.8 RESPONDNET DOESN'T REMEMBER WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE BORN |
|
QUESTION 3.8 RESPONDNET HAS A PROBLEM IN REMEMBERING NAMES OF HIS CHILDREN AND ABOUT THE NON BIOLOGIGAL CHILDREN CHILDREN HE DOESN'T REMEMBER THEM COMPLETELY |
|
QUESTION 3.8 RSPONDENT DOE'SNY THE MONTHS WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE BORN,WHEN TABITHA A ND BEATRICE DIED |
|
QUESTION 3.8 RSPONDENT DOESN'T KNOW OR REMEMBER WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE BORN BOTH HIS AND THOSE ONES IS TAKING CARE OF, HE DOESN'T KNOW WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE BORN BUT HE HAS BEEN STAYING WITH THEM SINCE THEY WERE BORN |
|
QUESTION 6.9 THE RESPONDENT COULD NOT KNOW THE COST OF THE MEDICINE |
|
QUESTION 9.2 THE CHILD HAS ONLY SIX MONTHS. |
|
QUETION 2.9 RESPONDENT DOESN'T REMEMNER WHEN THEY STARTED STAYING TOGETHER WITH HER HUSBAND. QUESTION 3.8-3.11 RESPODENT DOESN'T REMEMBER THE MONTHSA WHEN SHE GAVE BIRTH AND EVEN SHE CANNOT REMEMBER WHEN THEY WERE STLL YOUNG |
|
REFUSED TO MENTION HIS CHILDREN |
|
REFUSED TO MENTION HIS CHILDREN SAID ITS OF NO HELP |
|
RESPODENT DES NOT KNOW DATES OF BIRTH OF HIS CHILDREN |
|
RESPODENT WAS POSITIVE AND VERY RESOURCEFUL |
|
RESPODENT WAS WELCOMING |
|
RESPODENT WAS WELCOMING AND POSITIVE . HE WAS INQUISITIVE TOO ABOUT THE RESEARCH TAKING PLACE |
|
RESPODENTS NEVER USED TO WORK BEFORE UNTIL THREE YEARS AGO WHEN HUSBANDS INCOME WAS NOT ADEQUATE |
|
RESPODENTS OPERATES FROM HIS RURAL HOME. WANTS TO SELL HIS PLOT HASNT FOUND A WILLING BUYER |
|
RESPONDED WAS VERY COOPERATIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WILLING AND COOPERATIVE ABOUT THE INTERVIEW |
|
RESPONDENT ASKED THE FAR THE RESULTS OF THE NUMEROUS INTERVIEWS AND RESEARCH WORK HAS GONE AND INSISTED THAT SOMETHING SHOULD BE FORTHCOMING |
|
RESPONDENT AT FIRST SEEMED TO BE VERY CO-OPERATIVE BUT WITH TIME STOPPED AND EVEN ABUSED THE WIFE. |
|
RESPONDENT ATTITUDE FLUCTUATED WITH EACH QUESITON. EXAMPLE WHEN I ASKED ABOUT HER HEALTH SHE WOULD EXAGERATE LIKE COUGH ENDLESSLY AND EVEN TAKE MEDICINE. WHEN I ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT HER LINKS WITH HER HOME AREA SHE WOULD GET ALARMED TO READ |
|
RESPONDENT COMES HOME LATE IN WEEKDAYS. |
|
RESPONDENT CONCERNED ABOUT RESEARCH WHICH IS CONSTANTLY BEING CONDUCTED AND YET NO OUTCOME. |
|
RESPONDENT CONDITION IS WHEREBY THE INTENSTINE ARE DISLOGDED AND NEEDS TO BE RECTIFIED BY SURGERY. WHEN HE WAKES UP IN THE MORNING HE HAS TO RETURN THE INTESTINE BY THE HANDS MECHANICALLY ITS VERY PAINFUL AND WHEN HE HAS THE CONDITION EVEN WALK |
|
RESPONDENT COULD NOT COMMUNICATE IN SWAHILI. SHE IS BED RIDDEN- DISABLED: BOTH LEGS ARE PARALYSED. SHE HAS BEEN SICK FOR ALMOST 4YEARS - HER LEGS PAIN SO MUCH. SHE HAS UNDERGONE TREATMENT SEVERALLY AND HER PROBLEM BEING RELATED TO ARTHIRITIS. G |
|
RESPONDENT COULDNT REMEMBER DATES OF EVENTS BUT THE GRAND DAUGHTER WAS AROUND TO HELP WITHTHE DATES. SHE WAS SURE OF MOST OF THE DATES LIKE DATE OF SON'S BIRTH DATE WAS ESTIMATE |
|
RESPONDENT DECLINED ANSWERING QUESTIONS 2.6 AND 2.16 SAYING PEOPLE AS YOUNG AS I WAS NOT TO ASK HIM SUCH QUESTIONS RESPODNENT WAS NOT OPEN AND COULD NOT MENTION THE NON BIOLOGIGAL CHILDREN'S NAMES |
|
RESPONDENT DEPENDS ON THE STRUCTURE FOR INCOME YET SAYS MOST OF THE TENANTS DONT PAY PROMPTLY SO LACKS INCOME MOST OF THE TIME |
|
RESPONDENT DIDNT WANT TO PARTICIPATE INITIALLY BUT ACCEPTED LATER SINCE HE FELT THAT MY APPROACH WAS POLITE.HE FURTHER SIAD SINCE THE INCEPTION OF RESEARCH NOTHING BENEFICIAL HAS COME OUT OF RESERCH MEANING ONLY THOSE EMPLOYED AND THE ORGANISAT |
|
RESPONDENT DIVORCED WITH HUSBAND AFTER ALL THE CHILDREN DIED SUCCESSFULLY. SHE LIVES ALONE NOWADAYS |
|
RESPONDENT DOESN'T KNOW CHILDREN'S DATES OF BIRTH |
|
RESPONDENT DOESN'T RECALL SECOND OR FIRST NAME OF THE CHILDREN |
|
RESPONDENT DOESN'T REMEMBER THE MONTHS WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE BORN IN QUETION 3.8 QUESTION 8.28 RESPODNENT SAID THAT HE SPENT ALOT OF MONEY THAT HE CANNOT TELL THE EXACT FIGURE. |
|
RESPONDENT DOESNT KNOW WHEN CHILDREN WERE BORN IE THE MONTHS OF BIRTH |
|
RESPONDENT FEELS THAT HIV/AIDS AND "CHIRA" CURSE ARE INTERCHANGEABLE. THE LUOS HAD A CASE WHERE WHEN ONE FALTERED THE CURSE THAT FOLLOWED BEHAVED LIKE AIDS. HE EVEN NARRATED A STORY OF A COUSIN OF HIS WHO DIED BECAUSE OF NOT FOLLOWING TRADITION |
|
RESPONDENT HAD A VERY HARD TIME WHEN IT CAME TO QUESTIONS REGARDING HIS CHILDREN, HE WENT SILENT ESPECIALLY AFTER ASKING DATES OF BIRTH. HE KEPT ON SAYING ALL HE HAS IS PAIN IN HIS HEART AND THAT ONE WIFE HAD 3 CHILDREN BUT 1 IS LEFT, WHILE THE |
|
RESPONDENT HAD A VERY NEGATIVE AND THATS WHY SHE COULDNT REMEMBER THE DATES OF BIRTH SHE DIDNT EVEN WANT TO REMEMBER THE DATE OF MARRIAGE AND SEPARATION. SHE TOTALLY BLOCKED OUT THAT SHE WAS EVER MARRIED |
|
RESPONDENT HAD PREVIOSLY REFUSED THE INTERVIEW BUT WITH CHANGE OF INTERVIWER HE ACCEOPTED BUT WITH THE HELP OF THE CHILD |
|
RESPONDENT HAS A KIOSK WHICH IS RUN BY THE SON EVEN AS I CONDUCTED THE INTERVIEW HE WAS SELLING |
|
RESPONDENT HAS A PROBLEM IN REM,EMBERING THINGS WHEN CERTAIN OCCASSIONS HAPPENED E.G QUESTION 2.6, 2.15 ,3.8 ,5.15 |
|
RESPONDENT HAS BEEN TAKING CARE OF THE SICK MAJORITY ARE NEIGHBOURS BUT NOT WITH PROLONGED ILLINESS.A GOVT DOCTOR FROM KNH VISITS THE SLUMEVERY TUESDAY AT ST.ELIZABETH SCHOOL THIS IS WHERE THE RESPONDENT GETS CHECK UPS AND MEDICATION |
|
RESPONDENT HAS MOVE CHILDREN BUT DECLINED TO MENTION ALL INCLUDING THE DEAD ONES SAYING THEY WERE OF NO USE TO ANY OF US WHEREVER THEY ARE REPONDENT DOES NOT HAVE ANY CLOSE FRIENDS AND WON'T ASK FOR HELP FROM ANY NOR SHARED HER SECRETS WITH WH |
|
RESPONDENT HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN AVAILABLE BUT HE WAS VERY POSITIVE AND WANTS RESEARCH TO BE ACCOMPANIED WITH BENEFITS TO RESEARCH OR RESPONDENTS |
|
RESPONDENT HAS ONE EYE |
|
RESPONDENT HAS SIX CHILDREN AND FIVE DIED AT THE AGE OF 2 AND 3 WEEKS.SHE ALSO HAD THE MENTALITY THAT THE PROJECT WILL OFFER SOMETHING TO HER GRANDCHILDREN SINCE THEY ARE STILL YOUNG AND SHE FORCED ME TO WRITE DOWN THEIR NAMES EVEN IF THEY DID |
|
RESPONDENT IS BARREN HAS MARRIED ANOTHER WOMAN.SHE ALSO DECLINED TO MENTION THE CHILDREN`S NAMES,DATES OF BIRTH AND FATHERS STATUS.RESPONDENT IS OBESE HENCE ATTENDS CHECK UPS AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL |
|
RESPONDENT NEVER LIKES REMEMBERING CHILDREN THAT PASSED AWAY FOR THIS REASON SHE FIRST GAVE NAMES OF THOSE CHILDREN THAT ARE ALREADY THERE UNTILL I ASKED ABOUT THE OTHER TWO |
|
RESPONDENT NOW DEPENDS ENTIRELY ON WIFE AND KIDS. |
|
RESPONDENT REFERRED ME TO THE WIFE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ON CHILD HISTORY SINCE HE FELT HE DIDN\T HAVE THE TIME AND ITS THE MOTHER SHE WOULD BETTER HANDLE THE QUESTION THAN HIMSELF |
|
RESPONDENT REFUSED TO BE INTERVIEWED DURING THE FIRST INSTANCE |
|
RESPONDENT REFUSED TO GIVE DETAILS OF THE TWO DEAD CHILDREN. RESPONDNET DECLINED ON HAVING CLOSE FRIENDS HENCE 10.3 WILL NOT APPLY |
|
RESPONDENT REFUSED TO MENTION HIS CHILDREN |
|
RESPONDENT REFUSED TO MENTION THREE OTHERS WHO DIED |
|
RESPONDENT REFUSED TO SIGN BECAUSE HE THOUGH WE WORKED FO THE GOVERNMENT AND WANTED TO POSSESS HIS PLOT. SO HE THOUGH SIGNING WAS RELATED TO GIVING OUT HIS LAND POSSESSION |
|
RESPONDENT REQUESTS FOR INTERVENTION AFTER THE INFORMATION HAD BEEN COLLECTED AND ANALYSED |
|
RESPONDENT REQUESTS THAT RESEARCH SHOULD BE ACCOMPANIED WITH BENEFITS |
|
RESPONDENT SAID THAT HE NEVER WALKS DURING THE NIGHT NOT UNLESS TO THE SHOPS AND ONCE IN A WHILE HE FEELS SAFE |
|
RESPONDENT SAID THAT SHE HAD GIVEN SO MUCH INFORMATION ON HER CHILDREN AFTER BEING ASKED SOME EMBRASSING QUESTIONS AND WAS NOT READY TO GIVE ANY OTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING THEM, AS A RESULT SECTION 3 IS NOT COMPLETED |
|
RESPONDENT SAYS THAT SHE DOESNT HAVE NY CLOSE FRIENDS COZ PEOPLE ARE NOT TRUSTWORTH THIS DAYS SHE BELIEVE IN PRAYER AND NOT BORROWING |
|
RESPONDENT TOOK TIME TO AGREE TO BE INTERVIEWED AND WAS ATTENDING TO HIS ISSUES DURING THE INTERVIEW |
|
RESPONDENT UNDERSTANDS KIKAMBA BUT HER GRANDCHILDREN HELP ME TO GET THIS INFORMATION |
|
RESPONDENT WANTS BENEFITS TO BE FORTHCOMING FROM THE RESEARCH CONDUCTED, NOW THAT ITS LONG OVERDUE |
|
RESPONDENT WANTS INTERVENTION TO TAKE PLACE AFTER THE COLLECTION OF DATA, SHE SAYS ITS LONG OVERDUE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS COMPLAING OF THE NUMEROUS DATA COLLECTION, WITHOUT ANY TANGIBEL BENEFITS TO THE RESIDENTS BUT SHE ACCEPTED THE INTERVIEW |
|
RESPONDENT WAS COMPLAING THAT TOO MANY STUDIES WITH NO BENEFITS |
|
RESPONDENT WAS DIGRESSING FROM QUESTIONS SO MUCH THAT I TOOK A LONG TIME TO COMPLETE THE INTERVIWE. THERE SHOULD BE A SKIP ON Q 11.7 IF ANSWERE IN 11.4 IS 3 |
|
RESPONDENT WAS FIRST TOUGH AND DIFFICULT TO CONVINCE BUT LATER ON GAVE AN APPOINTMENT |
|
RESPONDENT WAS GOOD VERY MUCH GRATEFULL FOR MY VISIT. HE AS VERY MUCH CONVERSANT WITH SWAHILI AND THINGS WENT SMOOTH. HIS COMPREHENSION FOR THE ISSUES DISCUSSED WAS GOOD ALSO |
|
RESPONDENT WAS HESISTNAT AT FIRST SAYING HER PROBLEM COULD NOT BE DISCUSSED AS NO ONE CAN DO ANYTHING SINCE SHE WAS AILING FROM A TERMINAL DISEASE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS IN GRIEF HAD LOST A RELATIVE DURING THE TIME OF INTERVIEW |
|
RESPONDENT WAS INFORMATIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS INFORMATIVE AND POSITIVETHOUGH HE WAS UNABLE TO REMEMBER THE DARES OF BIRTH OF ALL CHILDREN |
|
RESPONDENT WAS INFORMATIVE AND VERY COOPERATIVE THOUGH COMPLAINED THAT THE RESEARCH CONTACTED IN KOROGOCHO SHOULD YIELD FRUITS, THEY ARE AOBUT TO BE FED UP WITH QUESTIONS |
|
RESPONDENT WAS INFORMATIVE AND VERY POSITIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS INFORMATIVE AND WILLING TO GIVE INFORMATION |
|
RESPONDENT WAS INQUISTIVE BUT VERY INFORMATIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS NASTY, WANTED TO GO FOR WORK BUT ACCEPTED THE INTERVIEW |
|
RESPONDENT WAS NOT UNDERSTANDING THE QUESTIONS EASLY SO IA HAD TO READ AND EXPLAIN OF REPHRASE THE QUESTINS IN A WAY SHE COULD UNDERSTAND |
|
RESPONDENT WAS NOT WILLING TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION. |
|
RESPONDENT WAS OPEN TALKING ABOUT REMARRYING AFTER HER HUSBAND DIED. |
|
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE ABOUT THE INTERVIEW AND WAS INFORMATIVE TOO |
|
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE AND ACCEPTED THE INTERVIEW, WAS INFORMATIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE AND INFORMATIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE AND RESOURCEFUL |
|
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE AND VERY RESOURCEFUL |
|
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE AND VERY RESOURCEFUL RESPONDENT WAS UNABLE TO APPEND SIGNATURE BUT WROTE HER NAME |
|
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE AND VERY WILLING TO TAKE THE INTERVIEW |
|
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE AND WELCOMING VERY RESOURCEFULLY. HE DOESNT KNOW MOST OF THE CHILDREN HE IS TAKING CARE OF BY NAMES |
|
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE AND WELCOMING. THE HIV/ AIDS PART WAS EMBARRASING TO THE RESPONDENT |
|
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE AND WILLING TO GIVE INFORMATION |
|
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE BUT INSISITED THAT BENEFITS SHOULD BE FORTHCOMING FROM THE RESEARCH |
|
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE BUT WAS THE OPINION THAT BENEFITS SHOULD ACCOMPANY THE RESEARCH |
|
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE THOUGH WAS COMMITTED, DECIDED TO ACCEPT THE INTERVIEW |
|
RESPONDENT WAS QUITE COOPERATIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS RELAXED AND INFORMATIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS RELAXED AND POSITIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS RELAXED AND POSITIVE THOUGH RERELY FOUND THIS IS ACCORDING TO THE RESPONDENT |
|
RESPONDENT WAS RELAXED AND WELCOMING |
|
RESPONDENT WAS RELUCTANT BUT FINALLY ACCEPTED |
|
RESPONDENT WAS RIGID BUT FINALLY GAVE THE INTERVIEW |
|
RESPONDENT WAS SICK AT THE TIME OF THE INTERVIEW |
|
RESPONDENT WAS SO CO-OPERATIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS THOUGHFUL ON THE ISSUE OF THE LATE CHILDREN HE SEEMED NOT TO BE VERY CO-OPERATIVE, HE SAID THAT LETS FORGET THE PAST AND FOCUS THE FUTURE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS VERY COOPERATIVE ONLY THAT IF OUND HIM AFTER A VERY LONG SEARH IN HIS HOUSE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS VERY COOPERATIVE. |
|
RESPONDENT WAS VERY HOSTILE AAND RESISTANT. DID NOT WANT TO ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS BECAUSE ACCORDING TO HER THEY WERE IRRELEVANT. THERE WAS ALSO ANOTHER OLD WOMAN VISITING WHO WAS INTRODUCED AS HER SISTER, THE SISTER STAYS IN GRAOGAN AND ALSO H |
|
RESPONDENT WAS VERY OPEN |
|
RESPONDENT WAS VERY POSITIVE AND GAVE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION WITHOUT MUCH PROBLEM |
|
RESPONDENT WAS VERY RELUCTAND IN GIVING RESPONSE SHE KEPT TALKING IN VERY LAW TON THAT I KEPT ASKING HER TO REPEAT HER RESPONSES. SHE DOESN'T KNOW WHEN THE CHILDREN DIED AND WHEN THEY WERE BORN, BUT SAID THAT THEY WERE 2ND 4TH BORN AND 6TH BORN |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WELCOMING |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WELCOMING AND ACCEPTED THE INTERVIEW |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WELCOMING AND POSITIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WELCOMING AND VERY CO-OPERATIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WELCOMING AND VERY COOPERATIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WELCOMING AND VERY INFORMATIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WELCOMING AND VERY POSITIVE |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WELCOMING AND VERY POSITIVE ABOUT THE INTERVIEW |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WELCOMING AND VERY POSITIVE FOR THE INTERVIEW |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WELCOMING AND WILLING TO GIVE ANSWERS BUT ASKED WHAT TE RESEARCH WAS UPTO AND WHAT BENEFITS WILL ACCOMPANY IT |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WELCOMING, INFORMATIVE AND AHOWED ALOT OF CONCERN WHEN IT CAME TO MATTERS OF HIV/ AIDS AND HE REALLY WANTS TO BE TESTED |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WELCOMING, POSITIVE. HE OPENED UP AND POINTED OUT THAT THEY ARE SO MANY RESEARCH STUDIES IN THE SLUM BUT NO BENEFIT AND THAT IS CAUSING ALOT TO RESIDENTS |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WELCOMING, SHE WAS POSITIVE BUT SHE WAS NOT ABLE TO RECALL SOME THINGS |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WELCOMING. IT WAS SUCCESSFUL |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WILLING TO ANSWER BUT DIDI NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT HELP THE QUESTIONS BEING ASKED COULD AFTER HIM OR HIS FAMILY |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WILLING TO BE INTERVIEWED. THOUGH SEEMS STRESSED UP COMPLAINS THAT KIDS HAVE ABANDONED HER AND THERE ISNT ANY BENEFIT FORTHCOMING FROM THEM. |
|
RESPONDENT WAS WILLING TO GIVE INFORMATION |
|
RESPONDENT WIVES ALL THREE LIVE IN KOROGOCHO BUT IN DIFFERENT HOUSES SPENDS ALOT OF TIME IN THE YOUNGEST WIFE'S RESIDENCE. BUT VISITS OTHER HOUSESSAY ONCE A WEEK TO TAKE MONEY FOR FOOD. AT THE TIME OF INTERVIEW HAD COME TO VISIT SECOND WIFE. |
|
RESPONDENT'S CHILDREN SO MANY THAT HE REFUSED TO NAME THEM ALL. HAS CHILDREN WHO ARE TODDLERS AND IN PRIMARY SCHOOL |
|
RESPONDENT'S MOTHER WHO IS VERY OLD WAS VISITNG. SHE WAS MAKING ALOT OF NOISE THE INTERVIEW WAS INTERRUPTED FOR SOMETIME BECAUSE SHE KEPT SINGING SONGS. GIVEN THE AUDIENCE SHE CONTINUED BUT WHEN WE IGNORED HER SHE KEPT QUIET AND ACTUALLY WENT B |
|
RESPONDENTS IST WIFE SEPARATED WITH HIM AND THE 2ND DIED. HE SAID HE HAS NO CHILDREN |
|
RESPONDENTS WANTS OUTCOME FROM THE RESEARCH UNDERTAKEN |
|
RESPONDFENT WAS REFERING TO ME A KIKUYU BIBLE FOR ANSWERS AND ASKED ME TO READ IT LOUD IJ A LOUD VOICE WHICH I HAD A VERY HARD TIME IN READING. AT TIMES SHE REFUSED TO BE INTERVIEWS AND PRAYED SHORTLY BUT LOUDLY IN BETWEEN THE INTERVIEW |
|
RESPONDNET DOESN'T REMEMBER THE MONTHS WHEN PETER EVANS AND GEORGE WERE BORN |
|
RESPONDNET HAD A SEVERE PROBLEM IN REMEMBERING MONTHS AND YEARS WHEN CERTAIN OCCATIONS HAPPENED |
|
RESPONDNET RECOMENTATION -CONGRATULATE FOR MY WORK. HE COMMENTED THAT YOU ARE ONE WITH THE TRUE REPORT OF THE PEOPLE LIVES. THE SUVEYS ARE OF BIG SIGNIFICANCE COME AGAIN. TOOK LONG BECAUSE THE RESPONDENT WAS SLOW AND HAD MANY QUESTIONS TO BE AS |
|
RESPONDNET REQUESTS THAT NGO AND GOVENMENT SHOULD REALLY SEE THE PLIGHT AFFECTING PEOPLE WHO STAY IN SLUMS AND DONT HAVE NO WHERE TO GO |
|
RESPONDNET WAS VERY WELCOMING SHE WAS GETTING OUT OF THE HOUSE UNDERTALE HER DUTIES BUT SHE ACCEPTED THE INTERVIEW. SHE WAS VERY POSITIVE |
|
RESPONDNET WAS VERY WELCOMING. THE VIGNETTE WAS DEMANDING FOR THE RESPONDENT |
|
RESPONSES IN QUESTION 4.7 MISSING |
|
RESPRONDENT DOESN'T REMEMBER THE YEARS AND MONTHS WHEN VERONICA, VICTORIA AND ALEXANDER WERE BORN IN QUESTION 3.8 |
|
ROBERT DENIS AND OKENYE DIED WHEN THEY WERE BELOW 12 YEARS |
|
RSPONDENT WAS LOOSING CONCERNTRATION SO OFTENLY. SHE ALSO DIGRESSESD TO VERY GREAT EXTENT GIVING ME A VERY HARD TIME TO INTERVIEW HER |
|
RSPONDENT WS INTIALLY VERY HARSH TO ME, SHE EVEN WANTED TO SENT ME AWAY UNTIL I TOLD HER THAT I LIVE IN KOROGOCHO AND WHO MY MOTHER IS . SHE AGREED TO BE INTERVIEWD BECAUSE MY MOTHER IS A GREAT FRIEND OF HERS |
|
SAID HE CANT TALK ABOUT HIS CHILDREN BECAUSE HE DOES NOT KNOW WHERE THE NAMES ARE BEING TAKEN |
|
SECTION 5 :THE RESPONDENT HAD EARLIER SAID THAT SHE HAS NO JOB OR BUSINESS BUT LATER ON SECTION 5.16 SAID THAT SHE HAS A SMALL SHAMBA NEAR KOROGOCHO WHERE SHE EARNS A LIVING CURRENTLY FROM SALE OF VEGETABLES. |
|
SHE BELIEVES ONE DAY THEY WILL GET HELP BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN ASKING THEM TOO MUCH QUESTIONS |
|
SHE COMPLAINED WHTA THE QUESTIONNAIRE WAS TOO LONG |
|
SHE COULD NOT UNDERSTAND KISWAHILI VERY WELL SO I HAD TO TRANSLATE SOME QUESTIONS |
|
SHE COULD NOT UNDERSTAND SWAHILI WELL IT WAS THROUGH ASSISTANCE. HE COMPREHENSION OF THE ISSE DISCUSSSED WAS VERY LOW. ITOOK MORE TIME BECAUSE OF THESE PROBLEMS ALSO SHE WAS VERY SLOW. |
|
SHE COULDN'T UNDERSTAND KISWAHILI SO WE HAD A TRANSLATER AND SHE HAD A BROKEN LIMB. |
|
SHE FEELS VIGNETTES IS A WASTE OF HER TIME |
|
SHE HAD AT FIRST REFUSED |
|
SHE IS HAVING SEVEN CHILDREN BUT SHE CANNOT RECALL THEIR AGE AND WHEN THEY WERE BORN IN 2.16 SHE CANNOT REMEMBER WHEN THE HUSBAND DIED |
|
SHE IS SICK TB AND HAS NO ENERGYHE GETS ANGRY WHEN ASKED SENSITIVE QUESTIONS LIKE WHEN THEY SEPARATED WITH THE WIFE. HE CANNOT DO ANYTHING BY HIMSELF |
|
SHE KEPT ON SAYING THAT THEY REALLY NEED MEDICINE WHEN THEY ARE SICK BECAUSE THEY CANT AFFORD THE COST OF VISIT |
|
SHE LEFT HER CHILDREN WITH THEIR FATHER IN ZAMBAA IN 1980 AND LOST TOUCH WITH THEM |
|
SHE LIED THAT SHE DOES NOT WORK YET SHE KEEP BROILER CHICKS. SHE FINDS QUESTIONS REPETITIVE. AND HER HOUSE LEAKS ALOT |
|
SHE PLEADED AND HOPE WE WILL HELP THEM BECAUSE SHE WAS COMPLAINING FROM THE MINUTE I ENTERED THE HOUSEHOLD |
|
SHE REFUSED TO SAY THE DETAILS ABOUT THOSE CHILDREN WHO ARE DEAD BECAAUSE THEY ARE GONE THERE IS NO NEED TO TALK ABOUT |
|
SHE SAID SOME QUESTIONS WERE PERSONAL E.G WHEN SHE STARTED LIVING WITH THE HUSBAND AND AGE |
|
SHE SAID THAT HOWEVER MUCH SHE WAS TRIED TO THINK OR REMEMBER WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE BORN SHE CANT BECAUSE SHE DID NOT WRITE SOMEWHERE AND SHE IS TOO OLD. |
|
SHE SEEMEN BOREF BY THE VIGNETTES |
|
SHE TOOK CARE OF HER DAUGHTER BEFORE SHE PASSED AWAY FOUR YEARS AGO. SHE DIED OF HIV/AIDS AND LEFT A SON WHO IS ALSO HIV INFECTED |
|
SHE WAS ANNOYED BECAUSE I ASKED HER WHEN SHE GOT MARRIED AND THE YEAR AND SAID SHE CAN'T REMEMBER. WHAT WAS I GOING TO DO WITH THE MONTHS AND YEAR OF THE CHILDREN AND YET SOME OF THEM LIVE IN THEIR OWN HOUSES |
|
SHE WAS GOOD AND WELCOMING.TOOK NORMAL TIME WITH HER.SHE WAS GRATEFUL FOR THE VISIT. SHE ASKED IF THE CENTRE COULD DO ANYTHING FOR THE OLD |
|
SHE WAS GOOD ENOUGH |
|
SHE WAS GOOD EVEN HER HUSBAND. THEY WERE VERY MUCH GRATFUL FOR MY VIST AND THE WORK I WAS UNDERTAKING AND MY VISIT ANOTHER TIME. |
|
SHE WAS GOOD NOT CONVERSANT WITH SWAHILI SO NEEDED A TRANSLATER I TOOK MORE TIME WITH HER OTHERWISE WAS WELCOMING |
|
SHE WAS GOOD. TOOK NORMAL TIME WITH THE QUESTIONNAIRE |
|
SHE WAS RUDE AND DIDNT WANT TO ANSWER MY QUESTIONS |
|
SHE WAS SAYING WE ARE ASKING TOO MANY QUESTIONS HOPE THIS TIME THEY WILL BENEFIT |
|
SHE WAS TO SOME EXTEND GOOD HER DEMAND WAS SO MUCH (INSISTING) ABOUT WHY INTERVIEWS ARE TAKEN AND NO HELP. SHE WAS EXPECTING AS SOMEBODY WITH NO CHILDREN O BE ASSISTED SO MUCH (EAGER)-THE MINUTE I ARRIVED AT HER PLACE SHE LOCKED HER KEYS IN THE |
|
SHE WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO INTERVIEQ |
|
SHE WAS VERY GRATEFUL FOR MY VISIT BUT SHE WAS INSISTING SO MUCH FOR PEOPLE VISITING THEM NOT ONLY THAT BUT GIVE OUT FOOD AND THE FRUIT OF THE INTERVIEW MADE |
|
SHE WAS VERY WELCOMING. I TOOK MORE TIME WITH HER BECAUSE SHE WAS SLOW. BUT HER COOPERATION, CONCENTRATION AND HER COMPREHENSION FO THE ISSUES DISCUSSED WAS GOOD. SHE WAS GRATEFUL FOR MY VISIT |
|
SHE WAS VERY WELCOMING. SHE WAS VERY SLOW THATS WHY I TOOK ALOT OF TIME. SHE WAS VERY CO-OPERATIVE AND VERY OPEN - SHE DISCLOSED THAT SHE HAS A DAUGHTER WHOSE POSITIVE SHE IS CARING FOR(WHEREAS OTHERS HIDE). VERY ATTENTIVE - LISTENING AND ANSWE |
|
SHE WAS VERY WELLCOMMING. I TOOK NORMAL TIME WITH HER ( NOLANGUAGE OR COMPREENSION PROBLEMS |
|
SHE WAS WELCOMING AND VERY GRATEFUL. TOOK TIME TO UNDERSTAND THE VINGNETTE |
|
SHE WAS WELCOMING. OTHERWISE TOOK NORMAL TIME WITH HER ( AS SHE WAS VERY CONVERSANT WITH SWAHILI) ALTHOUGH HER COMPREHENSION WAS MODERATE |
|
SHE WAS WILLING TO BE ASKED ANYTHING AND SAID THAT SHE IS VERY LONELY AND HOPED SHE WILL GET MORE PEOPLE TO COME AND VISIT HER |
|
SHE WAS WILLING TO GIVE INFORMATION DESPITE SHE WAS RECOVERING FROM SICKNESS |
|
SHE WAS WILLING TO GIVE THE INFORMATION REQUIRED |
|
SINCE HE WORKED IN THE INFORMAL SECTOR HE DID NOT MAKE ANY DEDUCTION FOR HIS RETIREMENT SCHEME SO DOESNT HAVE ANY RETITREMENT BENEFITS. HE STILL WORKS BUT IN HIS OWN BUSINESS TOGETHER WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE WIFE |
|
SINCE PROBING FOR NAMES AND DATES OF BIRTH WAS A TASK SETTLED FOR THOSE WHAT WERE GIVEN |
|
SOME 3 CHILDREN PASSED AND HE COULDNT PROVIDE ME WITH INFORMATION CONCERNING THEM |
|
SOME WORDS SHE COULDN'T UNDERSTAND IN KISWAHILI THE DAUGHTER TRANSLATED FOR HER. SHE SAID SHE IS HAVING PROBLEM WITH MEDICATION WHEN THE NON-BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN BECOME SICK BECAUSE SHE CANT AFFORD THE VISIT. THE WHOLE INTERVIEW SHE KEPT MENTION |
|
STAPLED PAGES WERE REPEATED |
|
STILL HAVE A PROBLEM WITH SKIPS. HOPE THEY ARE LOOKED INTO MEAWHILE WE HAVE INFORMED THE TL'S ABOUT THEM |
|
SUCCESSFUL |
|
THE RESPONDENT COOPERATED THOUGH HAD DIFFICULTIES |
|
THE AID EPIDEMIC SEEMED A STRANGE ISSUE TO DISCUSS AND HAD NOTHING TO SAY AT THE FIRST TIME BUT AFTER ALL HE JUST ANSWERED ME. THE ISSUE CONCERNING SECURITY QUESTION 10.12 -10.13 HE SAID HE CANNOT COMMENT ON THE QUESTION ON SECURITY SAFETLY ON |
|
THE DATE OF BIRTH OF HIS CHILDREN AND ALSO THE SECOND NAME COULD NOT BE REMEMBERED |
|
THE FAMILY RELOCATED TO V034153009,ACCORDING TO THE RESPONDENT,HE IS ALWAYS DRUNK AS PER THE CHILD AND NEIGHBOUR SO INFORMATION MIGHT NOT BE ACCURATE.THE ONLY IILINESS IS ALCOHOLISM AND BELIEVES THE ONLY DRUG HE USES IS ALCOHOL.HE WAS ADMITTED |
|
THE FATHER DID NOT GIVE SPECIFIC NUMBER OF HIS CHILDREN BUT SAID HE HAS SEVERAL NUMBER OF CHILDREN AS HE IS POLYGAMIST WITH 4 WIVES. HE SAID THERE IS NO NEED OF MENTIONING THE NAMES OF HIS CHILDREN AS THIS WILL BE OF NO HELP TO HIM |
|
THE FW HAS INDICATED THAT NAHASHON HAS 12 BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN BUT IN THE QUESTIONAIRE, THE FW HAS LISTED 11. FOR THE NON-BIOLOGICAL THE FW HAS INDICATED THE RESPONDENT HAS 4 BUT LISTED 3. COMMENT BY DEC |
|
THE FW ONLY GAVE INFORMATION ABOUT16 CHILDREN AND NOT 18 AS INDICATED. BY DEC |
|
THE INTER VIEW WAS OK |
|
THE INTERVIE WAS OK |
|
THE INTERVIEW COULD NOT BE COMPLETED ON 31/10/2006 BECAUSE THE RESPONDENT WAS SIC . IT WAS COMPLETED ON 04/11/2006 AT 12.30 PM. |
|
THE INTERVIEW ENDED SMOOTHLY |
|
THE INTERVIEW ENDED WELL THOUGH THE HOURS WERE ABIT ODD. |
|
THE INTERVIEW HAD TO BE STOPPED FOR SOMETIMES AROUND 15 MINUTES SO THE RESPONDENT HAD TO SELL SOME ITEMS THAT A CUSTOMER CAME TO COLLECT FROM THE HOUSE. THE NEGOTIATIONS WENT ON FOR 15-20 MINUTES |
|
THE INTERVIEW PROGRESSION WAS VERY GOOD UNTIL THE HUSBAND QUESTION 10 AND 11 FREELY. THE HUSBAND ALSO DEMANDED FOR THE INTERVIEW TO END SINCE HE DID NOT WANT ANY MEMBER OF HIS FAMILY OR ANY ASSOC WITH THE CONSTANT RESEARCH WHICH TO HIM WAS NOT |
|
THE INTERVIEW STARTED WITH A LONG DEBATE IN THE ASSISTANCE THE PROJECT OFFER AND THEIR VISION ON THIS AGING PROJECT. THE DEPATE LASTED ALMOST FOR ONE HOUR, HE REALLY COMPLAINED OF HUNGER |
|
THE INTERVIEW TOOK A LONG TIME BECAUSE THE RESPONDNET WAS VERYU BUSY WITH HOUSEHOLD DUTIES. |
|
THE INTERVIEW TOOK SO MUCH OF TIME. |
|
THE INTERVIEW WA A GREAT SUCCESS |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED IN A HURRY AS THE RESPONDENT KEPT ON ASKING IF WE WEREN`T THROUGH |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED IN A VERY TENSE ENVIRONMENT, BECAUSE THE RESPONDENT HAD SECT MEMBERS IN HER HOUSE. ALTHOUGH SHE SEEMED TO AGREED TO LISTEN TO ME AND EVEN WANTED TO DISCUSS MORE THE RELIGIOUS MEMBERS AT SOME POINT IS LIKE THEY DID NO |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED WHILE THE RESPONDENT WAS WASHING CLOTHES, AT A POINT SHE LEFT TO GO AND PUT THEM ON THE HANGING LINE FOR ABOUT 20 MINUTES |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE AFTER THE RESPONDENT HAD REFUSED THUS I HAD TO CONVIENCE HER |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE DURING LATE HOURS |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE SUCCESSFUL AS IT WAS VERY INTERESTING. |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE SUCCESSFUL AS THE REWSPONDENT IS COOPERATIVE AND BENEFIT EXPECTING |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE SUCCESSFUL AS WAS INTERESTING AND SOCIALISING. |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE SUCCESSFULLY AND ITS INTERESTING AND SUCCEEDING. |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE SUCCESSFULLY AS ITS INTRESTING AND SOCIALISING.THE RESPONDENT IS A BIT COOPERATIVE AS HE EXPECTS DONATION |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE SUCCESSFULLY. |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS EXTRA LONG |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS FAIR |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS FAIR ,GOOD |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS FAIR, HE EXPLAINED THAT HE DOESNOT WORK AND THAT HE ONLY DEPEND ON THE RENT FROM HIS 4 ROOMS . AFTER THE INTERVIEW HE SHOWED ME MANY SHOES IN ONE OF HIS ROOM WHICH LEFT CONFUSED AS TO WHETHER HE IS COBBLER OR SALES MAN |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS FAIRLY DONE |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD. |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS MORE SUCCESSFUL |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS OK |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS OK THE RESPONDENT SHIFTED FROM ROOM 1 TO STAY WITH HIS COUSIN IN ROOM 2 WHO IS MATHIAS MONGET NGITI. THATS WHYA THEREIS A CHANGE IN ROOM NUMBER |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS OK AFTER GOING BACK SEVERALLY TO LOOK FOR THE RESPONDENT. |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS OK THOUGH IT TOOK TIME TO CONVINCE THE OLD MAN FOR THE INTERVIEW BECAUSE HE HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY BY ANOTHER PERSON FROM THE SAME ORGANISATION BUT ON DIFFERENT PROJECT. |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS OK THOUGH THE RESPONDENT AT FIRST RESISTED TO BE INTERVIEWED BECAUSE SHE HAS BEEN ANSWERING MANY QUESTIONS FROM FIELDWORKERS FOR A LONG TIME WITHOUT SEEING HELP. |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS OK THOUGH THE RESPONDENT WAS COMPLAING TOO MUCH THAT HE HAS BEEN ANSWERING MANY QUESTIONS WITHOUT RECIVING ANY HELP |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS OK. |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS OKAY |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS OKAY THE RESPONDENT COOPERATED |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS OKAY. |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS OKEY |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS OKY |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESFUL AND INTERESTING. |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS TENSE. THE RESPONDENT HAD REFUSED TO ANSWER QUESITONS AT FIRST |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY DIFFICULT BECAUSE EVEN THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT WILLING TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AT FIRST BUT THERE WAS A DAUGHTER WHO HAD COME TO VISIT HIM SHE IS THE ONE WHO CONVINCED THE FATHER TO ANSWER. HAD IT NOT BEEN FOR HER HE FRANKLY S |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY SUCCESFUL |
|
THE INTERVIEW WENT WELL |
|
THE INTERVIEWEE/RESPONDENT WAS ANGRY BECAUSE OF THE "RESEARCH" PEOPLE AND THE QUESTIONS THEY ASK BUT DO PROVIDE NO HELP AT ALL. THERE IS NO PROJECT THAT THEY HAVE BEEN PROVIDED WITH DESPITE ASKING QUESTIONS EVERY OTHER DAY. HE SWEARED NOT TO CO |
|
THE INTERVIEWER WAS SO TIRESOME, BECAUSE THE MAN S. COMMENT BY DEC: THE FW DID NOT NAME OF THE CHILDREN WHO ARE NOT OF THE RESPONDENT, ONLY HIS . |
|
THE INTERVIOEW WAS FAIR BUT THE RESPONDNET ASKED HOW THE ORGANIZATION CAN HELP THE AGED WHO HAVE BEEN NEGLACTED BY THEIR FAMILIES AND LIVE ALONE. SISTER JEANS IS THE ONE PROVIDEING HEATH CARE AND OF WHICH IS NOT ENOUGH, THE AGED WHO GOT THERE T |
|
THE INTEVIEW WAS OK |
|
THE LADY SEEMED TO ANSWER TO SHORTEN STORIES, SHE WAS ANSWERING VERY FIRST. SHE HAD ATTEMPTED TO REFUSE |
|
THE LENGTH OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE WAS UNCOMFORTABLE FOR THE RESPONDENT AS SHE KEPT ON ASKING IF WE WERE ABOUT TO END THE INTERVIEW |
|
THE MAN CANT REMEMBER THE MONTH AND YEAR. |
|
THE MAN LIVES AT MUKURU KWA REUBEN. HE NO LONGER LIVES AT THE GIVEN LOCATION . ONE OF HIS CHILDREN TOOK ME TO WHERE HE LIVES. HE DIVORCED HIS WIFE |
|
THE MAN REFUSED TO GIVE THE NAMES OF THE CHILDREN. |
|
THE MAN SEEMED NOT FREE BECAUSE THE SECOND WIFE WAS PRESENT. ALSO HE EXPLAINED THAT HAS CHEST PAINS BUT DOESNT KNOW THE RESULT OF IT. HE ALSO EXPLAINED THAT IT DOES NOT AFFECT HIS BREATHING. HE FURTHER SAID HE CANNOT LIFT UP HIS HANDS ABOVE |
|
THE MARRIAGE WAS TRADITIONAL FOR 11 YEARS THEN WAS LATER FORMALISED IN CHURCH IN 1973. |
|
THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN GIVEN IS DOUBLED BECAUSE THE HAS GOT TWO WIVES BUT ITS LIKE HE HAS NOT GIVEN OTHER NAMES FOR HIS CHILDREN |
|
THE OLD MAN COLLECTS WASTES - IE PLASTICS/METALS FOR RECYCLING. HE IS VERY OLD AND WAS ASSISTED BY HIS SON IN SOME QUESTIONS AND ESPECIALLY Q 3.5 - 3.18. HE HAD DIFFICULTIES IN UNDERSTANDING THESE QUESTIONS FAST. |
|
THE OLD MAN REFUSED TOMENTION THE NAMES OF HIS CHILDREN SAYING THEY ARE AT UPCOUNTRY HOME AND SAW NO NEED OF MENTIONING THEM HERE |
|
THE PATIENT HAS NOT YET FULLY RECOVERED BUT NEEDS LITTLE ATTENTION. |
|
THE PERSON COMPAINED THAT WE YOUNG PPLE ARE USED BY OUR EMPLOYERS BADLY BECAUSE OF COLLECTING RAW DATA |
|
THE PERSON COMPLAINED THAT SHE HAS BEEN INTERVIEWED BEFORE FOR 7YEARS AND NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE. |
|
THE QUESTION 1.4 GAVE HIS DATE 0G BIRTH AS 01/07/1963 AND NOT AS INDICATED.THAT IS HE IS UNDER AGE |
|
THE QUESTION 1.4 THE RESPONDENT IS UNDERAGE THAT IS HAS DATE OF BIRTH IS 01/07/1963 AND NOT 01/07/1956 AS INDICATED,THIS MAKES A TOTAL OF 44 YEARS OLD. |
|
THE QUESTIONAIRE IS TOO LONG BUT HE WAS WILLING TO ANSWER |
|
THE QUESTIONS WERE TOO MANY AND HOPED THEY WILL GET HELP EVEN IF NOT HIM BUT OTHERS. |
|
THE QUIZ 10.2 AND 10.3 .I HAVE WRITTEN FRIENDS TO ACPTURE WHAT THE RESPONDENT MEANT |
|
THE QUIZ 6.4.8H I JUST WROTE YES WHILE IT NEEDED MORE CLARIFICATION.THEREFORE WE HAD TO DISCUSS WITH THE TEAM LEADER (MOSES) ABOUT THIS QUESTION |
|
THE REPONDENT WAS VERY DOOD AND HE WAS SLOW THAT IS WHY I TOOK MORE TIME WITH HIM. HE WAS VERY MUCH GRATIFUL TO BE VISITED |
|
THE RESPODENT ASKED THE QUESTIONS IN 11.16 AND LATER HE UNDERSTOOD WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT AND THE WHOLE ISSUE |
|
THE RESPODENT FELT HIS SEX LIFE SHOULD BE NOT OF MY CONCERN. HE SEEMS TO TIE HIV ISSUES WITH SEX |
|
THE RESPODENT SAID SINCE SHE AGREED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE INTERVIEW WHOLE HEARTEDLY SHE SEES NO NEED OF SIGNING |
|
THE RESPODENT TOOK TIME TO ANSWER AND HE SEEMED TO BE THINKING FIRST BEFORE ANSWERING ANY QUESTIONS |
|
THE RESPODENT WAS COMPLAINING ALOT |
|
THE RESPODENT WAS COOPERATIVE AND WILLING TO ANSWER ALLL QUESTIONS |
|
THE RESPODENT WAS RESPONDING WELL |
|
THE RESPODENT WAS VERY COOPERATIVE. THOUGH SHE FELT THAT I WAK TAKING SO MUCH OF HER TIME. SHE WENT ON WITH HER ACTIVITIES. THE RESPONDED WOULD FREQUENTLY INTERUPT AND ASK IF THERE IS ANY BENEFIT THEY WILL RECEIVE FROM THE RESEARCH. SHE CON |
|
THE RESPODENTS CHILD IS TAKING CARE OF HER |
|
THE RESPODNET WAS WILLING TO GIVE MORE INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE AND WAS GREATFUL AND HOPED WE WILL BE HELPED. THE QUESTIONS WERE TOO MANY |
|
THE RESPONDED REFUSED TO DIVERGE DETAILS ABOUT HIS FAMIL. HE WONDERED WHY HE SHOULD TALK ABOUT THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE NON RESIDENTS HERE |
|
THE RESPONDENT , GIVEN HIS AGE WAS ABLE TO CONCENTRATE HE WAS TEMPERAMENTAL |
|
THE RESPONDENT ACTUALLY HAS AN INJURY THAT HE GOT FROM ACCIDENT SOMETIMES BACK AND HIS WIFE RAN AWAY BECAUSE OF THE INJURY HE SUSTAINED |
|
THE RESPONDENT AND THE ENTIRE HOUSEHOLD DOESNT LIVE HERE ANYMORE. THEY ALL MOVED UPCOUNTRY AND ESTABLISHED THIS AFTER FINISHING THE INTERVIEW. |
|
THE RESPONDENT AT FIRST SAID HE DIDNT WANT TO TAL K ABOUT HIS WIFE AND CHILDREN. HE KEPT GIVING DIFFERENT ANSWERS ABOUT THE WIFE AND CHILDREN HENCE IT WAS DIFFICULT TO KNOW THE TRUTH. AND IF THE QUESITON WAS REPHRASED HE BEG ME TO GO TO ANOTH |
|
THE RESPONDENT AT PRESENT WAS NOT FEELING WELL FOR ABOT THREE WEEKS. HE VISITED KARIOBANGI HEALTH CENTER AND WAS GIVEN A PRESCRIPTION ASN HE WAS UNABLE TO BUY THE DRUGS. THE RESPOENDET SEPARETED WITH HIS WIFE SOME FEW YEARS AGO AND THE RESPOND |
|
THE RESPONDENT BEING A CHURCH ELDER WAS ANSWERING EVERY QUESTION ON WHETHER HE IS SATISFIED OR NOT, ON THE BASIS OF HIS FAITH THAT GOD IS EVERY THING,IF YOU BELIEVE IN HIM, YOU CANT BE SATISFIED WITH ANYTHING. |
|
THE RESPONDENT CANNOT REMEMBER THE DATES OF BIRTH OF HER CHILDREN THE FEAR WRITTEN I WAS ASSISTED BY HER DAUGHTER SUSAN NYAMBURA |
|
THE RESPONDENT CANNOT REMEMBER THE NAMES OF THE OTHER 2 CHILDREN SINCE HE DOESNT LIVE WITH THEM. ALSO THE CHRISTIAN NAMES OF SOME OF HIS CHILDREN WERE DIFFICULT TO REMEMBER. DATE OF BIRTH OF CHILDREN CANNOT BE REMEMBERED |
|
THE RESPONDENT CANT REMEMBER THE MONTHS THE ADOPTED CHILDREN WERE BORN. |
|
THE RESPONDENT CO-OPERATED VERY WELL. |
|
THE RESPONDENT CO-OPERATIVE WHEN APPROCHED BUT HE PUT IT FORWARD THAT HE NEEDED SOME HELP AS HE HAS NO WELL PAYING JOB BUT HAS A LARGE FAMILY WITH LITTLE CHILDREN. |
|
THE RESPONDENT COMES HOME LATE HOURS THEREFORE I MADE AN APPOINTMENT ON SUNDAY WHERE I HAD TO WAKE UP IN THE MORNING,FOUND HIM ASLEEP. |
|
THE RESPONDENT COMPLAINED THAT WE USSUALY ASK THE SAME QUESTION WITH NO ACTION. |
|
THE RESPONDENT COMPLAINED THATR THE QUESTIONNAIRE WAS TOO LONG AND SOME QUESTIONS WERE IRRELEVANT AND VERY PERSONAL E.G SECTION II AT THE END OF THE INTERVIEW THE RESPONDENT REFUSED TO GIVE ME ANY SUGGESTIONS OR ASK ANY QUESTIONS SAYING THAT IT |
|
THE RESPONDENT COULD NOT HEAR WELL BECASUE OF HEARING PROBLEMS. SHE HAD A BIG PROBLEM UNDERSTANDING SWAHILI LANGUAGE. HER COMPREHENSION OF THE ISSUE DISCUSSED WAS VERY BAD. |
|
THE RESPONDENT COULD NOT RECALL HIS LOCATION. |
|
THE RESPONDENT COULD NOT RECALL THE FIRST NAMES OF SOME CHILDREN. THE DATES OF BIRTH WERE ALL A PROBLEM. ONE EVENT SHE RECALLED WAS ONE, WHEN SHE OR THEY USED TO GO AND SEE KENYATTA'S CAR |
|
THE RESPONDENT COULD NOT REMEMBER COULD NOT REMEMBER THE EXACT DATES AND MONTHES ESPECIALLY FOR THE DATES OF BIRTHS |
|
THE RESPONDENT COULD NOT REMEMBER MONTHS AND AGE. THE RESPONDNET DID NOT KNOW THE DATES OF BIRTHS OF SOME OF HIS CHILDREN SECTION 4 Q4.5 THE RESPONDNET DID NOT KNOW THE MONTHS AND YEAR |
|
THE RESPONDENT COULD NOT REMEMBER THE DATES OF BIRTH AND DATED OF DEATH OF THE CHILDREN. 2. IF ANSWER TO 6.5 IS 18 THERE SHOULD BE A SKIP TO SECTION 7. 3. Q8.7 THE RESPONDNET DID NOT KNOW THE DATES AND THE MONTHS SHE STARTED CARRING FOR NZOMO |
|
THE RESPONDENT COULD NOT REMEMBER THE DATES OF BIRTH OF HIS CHILDREN. |
|
THE RESPONDENT COULD NOT REMEMBER THE NAME OF HIS 7TH CHILD WHO PASSED AWAY |
|
THE RESPONDENT COULD NOT SEE DUE TO OPERATION DONE TO HER EYES AND SHE IS LIVING ALONE. SHE TOOK ALOT OF TIME OF WHAT SHE WAS FEELING |
|
THE RESPONDENT COULD ONLY REMEMBER THE CHILDREN WHO ARE ALIVE |
|
THE RESPONDENT COULDIN'T UNDERTAND KISWAHILI AND I HAD TO USE AN INTERPRETER |
|
THE RESPONDENT COULDINT TALK ABOPUT HER DECEIVED DAUGHTER SUSAN WAIRIMU Q 10.1-10.5 MY REPONDENT THERE NO FREND ACCORDING TO HE GOD IS HER ALL Q8.9 SHE COULDINT TALK ABOUT HER SO I LEFT IT AT THAT |
|
THE RESPONDENT COULDNT TELL WHEN HIS CHILDREN WERE BORN |
|
THE RESPONDENT COULDNT UNDERSTAND SWAHILI WELL, THUSI HAD TO USE VERNECULAR |
|
THE RESPONDENT CULD NOT KISWAHILI SO HAD TO USE A TRAANSLATOR |
|
THE RESPONDENT DECLINED TO DISCLOSE THE DETAILS ABOUT THE 2 CHILDREN WHOM THE WIFE CAME INTO MARRIAGE WITH, THE WIFE TOO REFUSED TO GIVE DETAILS. THE LAST TIME THE RESPONDENT SOUGHT MEDICAL ATTENTION WAS ABOUT 4 YEARS AGO A COMPULSORY TEST PAID |
|
THE RESPONDENT DID NOT KNOW THE NO OF CHILDREN CHILD 2 3 5 6 AND 8 HAD |
|
THE RESPONDENT DID NOT WANT TO BE INTERVIEWED AT THE BEGINNING BUT INTERVIEWER MANAGED TO CONVINCE HIM. HE SAID THE QUESTIONS TEND TO REPEAT THEMSELVES |
|
THE RESPONDENT DIDNT UNDERSTAND SWAHILI AND THUS USE OF NATIVE LANGUAGE TO MAKE THE INTERVIEW A SUCCESS |
|
THE RESPONDENT DIDNT WANT TO DISCUSS ON THE PART OF HER CHILDRWEN. SHE WAS ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS RECKLESSLY. AT ONE POINT SHE EVEN TOLD ME TO LEAVE ABOUT THE CHILDREN |
|
THE RESPONDENT DISCOVERED THAT SHE HAS HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE RECENTLY. THOUGH SHE HAS NOT TAKEN ANY DRUGS. SHE THINKS THAT IT IS CAUSED BY MUCH STRESS DUE TO FINANCIAL PROBLEMS SHE HAS ENCOUNTERED OF LATE. SHE SAYS SHE HIGHLY NEEDS CAPITAL TO SET |
|
THE RESPONDENT DIVORCED WITH HIS FIRST WIFE WHO IS THE MOTHER OF THER FIRST SIX CHILDERN. HE THEREFORE DOESN'T KNOW WHERE THEY ARE CURRENTLY LIVING. HE ISN'T SURE IF THEY ARE CURRENTLY MARRIED OR NOT |
|
THE RESPONDENT DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO READ. HAD PROBLEMS TRYING TO REMMEBER THE EXACT D.O.BS FOR HIS CHILD. HE HAS A POOR MEMORY. HE CANT REMEMBER SOME OF HIS KIDS NAMES |
|
THE RESPONDENT DOESNT RECALL FIRST AND SECOND NAME OF CHILDREN |
|
THE RESPONDENT DONT KNOW SWAHILI OR ENGLISH.I HAD TO CALL SOMEONE WHO KNOWS HER LANGUAGE TO INTERPRATE |
|
THE RESPONDENT FIRST REFUSED TOTALLY TO LISTEN TO ANYTHING I WANTED TO TELL HIM.THROUGH ALOT OF DIFFICULTY IN EXPLAINING WHT APHRC IS ALL ABOUT ,HE AGREED TO COOPERATE.HE CLAIMED THAAT THERE IS NO BENEFIIT ONTHEIR PARTAS THE PEOPLE ANSWERING TH |
|
THE RESPONDENT FOUND THE QUESTIONNAIRE QUIET LONG AND COMPLAINED THAT IN FUTURE WE SHOULDINT HAVE LENTH QUESTIONAIRES WHICH TAKE MOST OF THEIR TIME |
|
THE RESPONDENT GAVE ALOT OF CALL BACKS THAT HE DID NOT ADHERE TO BUT WHEN I FOUND HIM SOBER HE DID COOPERATE DURING THE INTERVIEW. |
|
THE RESPONDENT GAVE ME A HARD TIME BECAUSE THE 1ST TIME I WENT SHE CHASED ME AWAY EVEN WITHOUT LISTENING TO ME. BUT FINALLY SHE AGREED AFTER GOING BACK AGAIN |
|
THE RESPONDENT GOT HIS FIRST BORN BEFORE LEGALLY GETTING MARRIED |
|
THE RESPONDENT GOT TIRED AT SOME POINT. THEN HE DID COMPLAIN THAT THE QUESTIONNAIRE WAS LONGER THAN THE OTHERS. BUT AT LEAST AFTER SOMETIME HE PICKED UP AND CONTINUED. |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAD A LOT OF STORIES. HE RECEIVES ASSISTANCE FROM HIS CHILDREN SOMETIME IN KIND AND SOMETIMES IN CASH. THEY ASSIST HIM RANDOMLY SO HE IS NOT ABLE TO MEASURE WHAT HE RECEIVES PER MONTH |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAD A VERY HARD TIME TO ACCEPT THE INTERVIEW SHE COMPLAINED ON THE MANY QUESTIONS SHE HAS ANSWERED AND NOT SEEN FRUITS. THUS AFTER A LONG CLARIFICATION SHE ACCEPTED AND REFUSED TO LIT THE LAMP AND IT WAS NIGHT. I REALLY STRAINED |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAD DECLINED TO TAKE THE INTERVIEW. |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAD DIFFICULTIES IN TALKING ABOUT HIS KIDS. I COULD ONLY CONVINCE HIM TO GIVE THE 9. HE SAYS HE HAS LOST NUMBER OF THEM AND DID NOT WISH TO TALK ABOUT THEM |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAD FIRST REFUSED THAT SHE WAS NOT THE OWNER OF THE HOUSE AND SHE IS A VISITOR AND WHEN I EXPLAINED OF MY MISSION SHE ACCEPTED IT WAS HER AND THAT SHE HAD ANSWERED THE SAME QUESTIONS KNOWING THAT I WAS THE ONLY PERSON WITH HER CO |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAD GONE HOME DURING THE DECEMBER HOLIDAYS (LAST YEAR) BUT COME CAME BACK EARLY THIS YEAR. HE WAS WELCOMING AND VERY CO-OPERATIVE DURING THE INTREVIEW. |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAD POSTPONED THIS ITNEVIEW ALMOST 5 TIMES |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAD REFUSED TO ANSWER ONE OF MY COLLEAGUE AND WHEN I WENT IN THE EVENING SHE ACCEPTED TO ANSWER ME AND I REALLY HAD TO CONVIENCED HIM ON THE IMPORTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAD REFUSED TO ANSWER SOME QUESTION ESPECIALLY CONCERNING WIFE AND CHILDREN BUT ANSWERED AFTER THREE DAYS RETURN TO HIM |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAD RETIRED FROM WORK BUT WAS LATER CLLED BY ONE OF THE WORKMATE WHEN THEY WERE WORKING TOGETHER BEFORE. |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAD THREE CHILDREN BUT REFUSED TO TELL ME THE THIRD SINCE HE IS NOT ALIVE |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAD TO BE HELPED BY THE DAUGHTER ESPECIALLY PART OF SIGNING BECAUSE HE IS BLIND |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAD TRAVELLED FOR A WHILE AND HE CAME BACK WHEN I NEEDED HIM MOST FOR THE FINAL TOUCHES |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAILS FORM NEWLY CREATED KHAMISI DISTRICT. (YET TO BE GAZZETTED) FORMERLY VIHIGA DISTRICT. |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAS BEEN FORCED TO STAY IN KOROGOCHO BECAUSE ITS THE APPROPRIATE RESIDENCE FOR HER TO BE NEAREST TO KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL AND OTHER MEDICAL CENTRES WHERE SHE GOES FOR HER CHECK-UPS. OTHERWISE SHE HAS BEEN WANTING TO GO BACK |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAS BEEN MARRIED TO SIX WIVES LIVING IN DIFFERENT AREAS. HE HAS 17 CHILDREN BUT ONLY GAVE NAMES FOR THE FIVE CHILDREN WHO BELONG TO THE WIFE LIVING WITH HIM IN THIS STRUCTURE |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAS BEEN SUFFERING FROM OCCASIONAL CHEST PROBLEMS WHICH HE BELIEVES CAME FROM THE SOCIETY (CLAN) BUT MOST BREATHING DIFFICULTIES. |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAS MOVED FROM THE LOCATION WHERE HE USED TO LIVE TO ANOTHER LOCATION BUT IN THE SAME DSA |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAS PROBLEM IN READING |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAS PROBLEM WITH HIS BREATHING SINCE HE HAS A CERTAIN GROWTH IN THE NOSE |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAS SOME FINANCIAL PROBLEMS. IF THE ORGANIZATION CAN DO SOMETHING TO HELP THE OLD LIKE PROVIDING FINANCIAL SUPPORT |
|
THE RESPONDENT HAS TWO CHILDREN WHO ARE EPILEPTIC HE TOLD ME THAT HE NEEDED 11,000 FOR THEIR TREATMENT BUT HAS ONLY COME UP WITH HALF THAT AMOUNT I CONTRIBUTED 2,000 AT LEAST TO BOOST HIM. THE CHILDREN DROPPED OUT OF SCHOOL BECAUSE OF THIS PROB |
|
THE RESPONDENT HEALTH SEEKING BEHAVIOUR RELIES ENTIRELY ON HERBAL MEDICINE. USES MEDICINE FROM HOSPITAL IN RARE OCCASIONS |
|
THE RESPONDENT HOPES THAT BY ASKING THIS QUESTIONS SOMETHING WILL BE DONE BECAUSE THEY ARE REALLY SUFFERING. DESPITE OF THE FACT THAT SHE WAS WILLING TO GIVE THE DETAILS REQUIRED AS IN ALL HER PROBLEMS |
|
THE RESPONDENT HOPES THAT THEY WILL BE HELPED AFTER WHAT WE ARE DOING AND THAT THEY WILL BE OF BENEFIT. SHE WAS CO-OPERATIVE |
|
THE RESPONDENT INITIALLY HAD REFUSED TO BE INTERVIEWED BY OTHER FW. BUT SHE ACCEPTED AFTER I TOLD HER WHAT I HAD WAS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT OTHERS ASK. |
|
THE RESPONDENT INTERUPTED THE INTERVIEW SEVERAL TIMES TO ATTEND TO NEIGHBOURS AND HER CHILDREN. |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS 59YRS OLD BUT HE INSISTED THAT HE HAS NOT REACHED THE RETIREMENT AGE. THAT IS IN Q4.11 AND 5.6 |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS A UGANDAN LIVING AS A REFUGEE. |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS AVAILABLE ONLY ON SUNDAYS, DUE TO THIS I MADE AN APPOINTMENT WITH HIS WIFE ANF FOUND HIM. |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS BED RIDDEN WITH COMPLAIN OF TOOTHACH. THE RESPONDNET ONLY DAUGHTER SUSAN NDUKU DIED AND HE CANNOT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT HER.5.3 SHE WORKED FOR 20 YEARS BUT CANNOT TELL THE LAST TIME SHE STOPPED WORKING. SHE SAYS SHE HAS PROBLEM |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS BEDRIDDEN AND NO ONE TO CARE FOR HER JUST DEPENDS ON WELL WISHERS |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS BLIND AND RELIES OM BEGGING.SHE COMES ALL THE WAY FROM TANZANIA.SHE LIVES WITH HER SISTER AND HER YOUNGEST BOY. |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS CO-OPERATIBVE BUT HER HOUSE WAS RAINING ALL OVER |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS CO-OPERATIVE AND INSISTS MORE ON MEASUREMENTS AS HE HAS DOUBT IN HIS HEALTH. THEREFORE I URGE IF IF POSSIBLE TO SAMPLED HIM IN THE NEW PROJECT WHICH IS (CVD)CARDIVASCULAR DISEASE ROW FACTOR |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS MENTALLY ILL SO I DID THE INTERVIEW WITH THE HELP OF HIS SON-IN-LAW |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS OUR FAMILY FRINED AND SHE DOES NOT ANSWER TO ANY QUESTIONS, SHE DID IT BECAUSE SHE IS KNOWN TO ME |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS QUIET BORED WITH A.P.H.R.C AS HE HAS NEVER SEEN THE BENEFITS OF THE RESEARCH IT CONDUCTS .HE ANSWERED ME ONLY BECAUSE HE KNOWS ME WELL |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS SICK, HE WAS DONE FOR AN OPERATION AND AT THE TIME OF THE INTERVIEW WAS FEELING ABIT BETTER. |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS TOO OLD. HE TAKES A LOT OF TIME TO GIVE OUT AN ANSWER. Q3.5-3.18 THE RESPONDENT NOT READY TO DISCUSS HIS CHILDREN |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS USUALLY DRUNK MOST OF THE TIMES. HE IS KIND OF ARROGANT. HIS WIFE HELPED DURING THE INTERVIEW IN AREAS SUCH AS REMEMBERING THE NUMBER OF KIDS AND THE LIKE. IT WAS VERY DIFFICULT INTERVIEWING THE PERSON |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS VERY COOPERATIVE BUT SINCE THE HUSBAND WAS AROUND,SHE WAS BEING ABUSED AND THREATENED BY THE HUSBAND. |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS VERY OLD AND COULD NOT UNDERSTAND KISWAHILI. SO HER GRANDCHILD HAD TO TRANSLATE EVERYTHING |
|
THE RESPONDENT KEPT ON TELLING ME THAT HE IS GOING AND THAT THIS RESEARCH WONT HELP HIM BECAUSE BY THE TIME THE ORGANIZATION DECIDES TO HELP HE WILL HAVE DIED |
|
THE RESPONDENT KNOWS NEITHER THE DATES OF BIRTH OF THESE CHILDREN NOR THE DATES OF DEATH. IN Q2.16, THE RESPONDENT DID NOT KNOW THE DATE OF DFEATH OF HER HUSBAND. Q8.7 THE RESPONDENT DID NOT KNOW THE MONTH AND YEAR. Q2.6 THE RESPONDENT DID NOT |
|
THE RESPONDENT LIVES A FEW METRES FROM THE RIVER. HER HOUSE HAS BEEN BROKEN INTO SEVERALLY BY THIEVES AND BEATING THEM UP. THE RESPONDENT IS IN GREAT FEAR SINCE LAST YEAR THEY WERE BEATEN AGAIN AND LAST NIGHT THE THEIVES AND THEY LIVE UNDER GR |
|
THE RESPONDENT MARRIED BUT THEIR MARRIAGE NEVER LASTED BECAUSE THEIR SEPARATED EVEN, WITHOUT HAVING ANY CHILDREN. SINCE THEN HE HAS NEVER MARRIED AGAIN |
|
THE RESPONDENT NEVER GAVE HARD TIME BUT THEN HE COMPLAINED OF NO BENEFIT TO HIM AS A RESULTOF ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS. |
|
THE RESPONDENT ONLY AGRED TO BE INTERVIEWED BECAUSE HE HAD SEEN ME COME INTO THE COMPOUNT CONVERSING WITH A PASTER WHO SHOWED ME A HOUSE OF THE RESPONDNET I WAS TRYING TO LOCATE AND WHO HAPPENS TO BE A MEMBER OF HIS CONGREGATION AND A NEIGHBOU |
|
THE RESPONDENT ONLY GAVE ME THE FIRST NAMES OF HIS CHILDREN COMPLAINING THAT HE HAD ALREADY BEEN INTERVIEWED SOME TIME BACK |
|
THE RESPONDENT RAISED CONCERN OVER THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THESE RESEARCH AND SAID HE ONLY AGREED TO RESPOND BECAUSE HE KNOWS AM WORKING AND WOULDNT WANT ME TO LOOSE MY JOB JUST BECAUSE HE REFUSED TO RESPOND |
|
THE RESPONDENT REFUSED COMPLETELY TO TELL ME OF HER CHILDREN AND TOLD ME IF THE PROJECT OR ANY OTHR ORGANZIATION MAY HELP HER AS AN OLD WOMAN LIVING IN KOROGOCHO |
|
THE RESPONDENT REFUSED TO DECLOSE ABOUT HIS CHILDREN. HE THAT HE HAD EARLIER GIVEN ALL THE NAMES OF HIS CHILDREN AND THAT HE DIDN'T SEE THE NEED OF LISTING THEM AGAIN |
|
THE RESPONDENT REFUSED TO GIVE DETAILS OF FIRST MARRIAGE |
|
THE RESPONDENT REFUSED TO GIVE ME THE NAMES OF THE CHILDREN HE HAD WITH HIS FIRST WIFE, HE EXPLAINED SINCE HE HASN'T SEEN THEM IN SUCH A LONG TIME HE DOESNT CONSIDER THEM HIS CHILDREN ANYMORE |
|
THE RESPONDENT REFUSED TO SAY THE NAMES OF THE CHILDREN. |
|
THE RESPONDENT REFUSED TO SIGN BECAUSE I COULDN'T A COPY OF THE CONSENT FORM WITH HIM |
|
THE RESPONDENT REFUSED TO TELL ME HER OTHER CHILDREN |
|
THE RESPONDENT REFUSED TO TELL ME THE SECOND NAMES OF THE CHILDREN CLAIMING THE FIRST ONE WAS ENOUGH CONSIDERING HE HAS GIVEN ME THEIR OTHER DETAILS |
|
THE RESPONDENT REFUSED TO TELL OF THE OTHER 8 CHILDREN OFWHICHSHE SAID THEY WERE DECEASED AND IN THEIR CULTURE THEY DONT TALK ABOUT THEM.THE RESPONDENT REQUIRED SOMETO INTERPRETER FOR HER THUS SHE USED HER DAUGHTER |
|
THE RESPONDENT REFUSES TO ASY ANYTHING ABOUT HER THREE CHILDREN WHO DIED CONSEQUENTLY I.E THE LAST THREE.AFTER INSISTING THE RESPONDENT GETS IRRITATED AND FRIGHTENS NOT TO STOP THE INTERVIEW |
|
THE RESPONDENT RESEFUSED COMPLETELY TO TELL THE NAMES OF SOME OF HER CHILDREN CLAINMING THAT THEY ARE ABROAD AND THERES NO NEED OF HER GIVING ME THEIR DETAILS |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID BEFORE HAND THAT HE DOESNT WANT ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE WIFE AND CHILDREN |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID HER BODY IS FIT EVEN AT THIS AGE BECAUSE SHE ENGAGES IN RUNNING BATTLES AWAY FROM CITY COUNCIL ASKARIS IN THE CITY CENTRE |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID HIS NAME IS JOHN OCHANDA BUT NOT PATRICK OMOLLO AS IN THE IDENTIFICATION FORM |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID HIS PROBLEM ARE WORK RELATED, AS HE DOES HEAVY WORK OF LIFTING HEAVY OBJECTS AND CARRYING BUILDING MATERIALS THAT ARE HEAVY, SO THERE IS NO WAY HE CANT BE HAVING BACKACHEAND JOINT PROBLEM |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID I INTERVIEW HIM AT HIS PLACE OF WORK, AT TIMES, HE SPENT 10 MINUTES OR MORE TALKING TO CUSTOMERS |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID SHE CANT TALK ABOUT HER DEAD CHILDREN, AS SHE HAS LOST 5, BUT SHE GAVE THE NAME OF THE FIRST BORN ONLY. SHE SAID I WRITE THE FOUR WHO ARE ALIVE |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID SHE HAS NO CHILDREN OF HER OWN. |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID THAT ALL THESE WERE NONSENSE BECAUSE SHE HAS BEEN ASKED THE SAME QUESTION LAST YEAR. |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID THAT HE HAD SUFFERED FROM DIABETES FOR A LONG TIME. HE ALSO SAID HE CAN'T REMEMBER THE DATES HIS CHILDREN WERE BORN. HE IS A SHOPKEEPER AND OPENS HIS SHOP AT SIX AND CLOSES AT EIGHT. |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID THAT ONLY 2 MONTHS AGO HE WAS ALMOST GETTING MENTALLY ILL BUT SINCE HE IS ON MEDICATION HE NOW FEELS ALRIGHT, BUT WILL STILL CONTINUE ON THE MEDICATION AND ATTEND CLINIC |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID THAT SHE'D BEEN ANWERING THE SIMILAR QUESTIONS AND NO ACTION GOVERNMENT TAKES. BUT EVENTUALLY SHE CO-OPERATED AND ANSWERED ALL THE QUESTIONS. |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID THAT SINCE HE WAS BORN HE DOESNT GET ILL FROM THIS COMMON ILLINESS BUT ONLY MALARIA. TO DATE ONE MONTH CANNOT PASS GET, MALARIA STILL ATTACKS HIM BUT NO OTHER DISEASES/ILLINESS. THE RESPONDENT SAID THAT MOST HEALTH FACILITY |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID THAT THE COMPANY HE WORKS FOR AS A DRIVER, AFTER EVERY 3MONTHS, THEY GO FOR A CHECK UP, BECAUSE YOU CANT DRIVE A TANKER WHILE YOU ARE ILL OR IF THEY SUSPECT YOU ARE UNHEALTHY, AS AT TIMES YOU GO FOR LONG DISTANCE JOURNEY, SO |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAYS HE IS A HAND CART PULLER. |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAYS HER BODY IS VERY HEALTHY AND WHATEVER SHE EATS COMES FROM GOD. |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAYS THAT HE HAS SHIFTED HIS STAY TO UPCOUNTRY AFTER HE RETIRED BUT HE IS JUST AROUND BECAUSE HE IS CHASING FOR HIS BENEFITS . BUT ONE CHILD WILL STAY IN THE HOUSE |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAYS THAT HE IS SO MUCH BORED BY THIS QUESTION OF RESEARCH WITH NO OUTCOME(DONATIONS) |
|
THE RESPONDENT SEEEMED NOT TO BE OPEN AND SERIOUS DURING THE INTERVIEW |
|
THE RESPONDENT SEEMED NOT TO CONCERTRATE ON THE QUESTIONS |
|
THE RESPONDENT SEEMED TO ANSWER ALL THE QUESTIONS OF HEALTH PROBLEM NEGATIVELY THAT IS SAYING NO AND IT WAS TO QUICKLY DISMISS ME. THE INTERVIEW WWAS NOT FAIR AS HE NEVER DISCUSSED ANYTHING IN LENGTH ALTHOUGH MAYBE ITS BECAUSE I FOUND HIM IN H |
|
THE RESPONDENT SEEMED TO BE NOT OKAY UPSTAIRS FROM THE WAY SHE WAS CONDUCTING HERSELF MADE ME CONCLUDE THASHE WASN'T SANE. |
|
THE RESPONDENT SEEMED TO BE STUBBORN BUT I SUCCEEDED IN DOING THE INTERVIEW. |
|
THE RESPONDENT SEEMS VERY HEALTHY AND STRONG. HE WAORKS IN A FACTORY. |
|
THE RESPONDENT SELLS LOCAL BREW AND THE ISSUE CONCERNING MARITAL STATUS REALLY RATTLED HER AND SHE BECAME AGGRESIVE. SHE WAS ALSO DRUNK |
|
THE RESPONDENT SHARES WITHNO ONE ABOUT HER PROBLEMS SINCE SHE HAS NO SPOUSE OR CHILDREN |
|
THE RESPONDENT SHIFTED TO ANOTHER LOCATION. |
|
THE RESPONDENT SOMETIMES HAS JOINT PAINS WHICH DISAPPEAR ON THEIR OWN. SHE SAID THAT SHE SOMETIMES FALLS DOWN BUT NOT BECAUSE OF LEPROSY BUT JUST LIKE THAT. ON HER OWN |
|
THE RESPONDENT SOMETIMES LIVES IN VIWANDANI AND SOME IN KOROGOCHO AND HIS FAMILY IN THIKA |
|
THE RESPONDENT SPEECH WAS INAUDIBLE AND SO SHE HAD TO REPEAT HIMSELF OTHERWISE EVEN COMMUNICATION WAS POOR SINCE SHE DIDNT UNDERSTAND SWAHILI |
|
THE RESPONDENT SPENDS MOST OF HER TIME IN RURAL KENYA. SHE ONLY COMES TO NAIROBI WHEN SHE'S BEING MUTED BY HER HUSBAND.THEREFORE I WAS LUCKY TO HAVE FOUND HER AT HUSBAND'S HOUSE. |
|
THE RESPONDENT SPENDS MOST OF HIS TIMES IN HIS RURAL AREA (PLACE OF ORIGIN) AND OCCASIONALLY COMES TO NAIROBI WHERE HE HAS SOME PLOTS |
|
THE RESPONDENT THOUGH QUITE KIND OF TRYING TO COOPERATE, DID FIND THAT THERE WAS NO BENEFIT ON THE PART OF THE QUESTIONS. HE WAS OF THE VIEW THAT THEY ARE ASKED MANY QUESTIONS ABOUT TOILET FACILITIES AND OTHERS LIKE HEALTH BUT THEY DONT RECEIVE |
|
THE RESPONDENT THREATENED TO BAIL OUT OF THE INTERVIEW EVERYTIME SHE THOUGHT THE QUESTIONS WERE TOO PERSONAL. SHE TOLD ME THAT SHE ACCEPTED TO BE INTERVIEWED ONLY BECAUSE SHE VIEWED ME AS HER GRANDCHILD THUS COULDN'T REFUSE |
|
THE RESPONDENT THREE CHILDREN DIED AT THE SAME TIME ON JUNE THIS YEAR AND SHE STILL HAS SOME PAIN |
|
THE RESPONDENT TOLD ME THAT HE CANNOT REMEMBER THE CHILDREN OF THE DECEASED DAUGTHER (CHUNZUNI) WHICH HE TAKES CARE OF IN THE PAST. BUT I GUESS THAT HE INCLUDED THEM IN THE BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN'S LIST. AFTER PROBING HE SAID THAT ALL THE CHILDREN |
|
THE RESPONDENT TOLD ME THAT SHE HAS NO CHILDREN AND NEVER BEEN MARRIED BUT EARLIER WHEN I WAS TALKING TO THE NEIGHBOUR TRYING TO GET THE TIME I SHOULD COME BACK AND FIND HER THE NEIGHBOUR HAD TOLD THAT THE WOMAN'S CHILDREN STAY UPCOUNTRY |
|
THE RESPONDENT TOLD ME THAT SINCE THE OTHER CHILD IS REALLY SMALL THERE IS NO NEED OF WRITING NAME DOWN |
|
THE RESPONDENT WANTED TO KNOW HOW THE REPORT WILL HELP HIM. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WANTED TO KNOW WHAT WILL HAPPEN AFTER THIS RESEARCH. I HAD DIFFICULTIES TRYIONG TO EXPLAIN TO HER EVERYTHING. SHE ALSO HAD PROBLEMS WITH TALKING ABOUT HER DEAD HUSBAND AND ALSO HER SON JOSEPH WAINAINA |
|
THE RESPONDENT WARMLY WELCOMED ME AND HE WAS VERY HAPPY OF HIS HEALTH AND GOD DOES NOT GIVE HIM UNLESS HA HAS A LOT TO DO TO HIS CHILDREN.THE RESPONDENT MARRIED THE TWO WIVES TRADITIONALLY BUT AFTER A WHILE THEY WENT TO THE DC AND GOT DC`S MARR |
|
THE RESPONDENT WARMLY WELCOMED ME AND WAS ATTENTIVE TO THE QUESTIONS AND I REALLYEXPLAINED WHENEVER SHE WAS UNABLE TO UNDERSTAND |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS A GOOD ONE BUT SHE KEPT ON COMPLAINING CLAIMING THAT THE RESEACH WAS OF NO GOOD TO HER |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS A LITTLE BIT IN A HURRY TO MEET SOME ONE BUT ATLEAST GAVE ME TIME TO COMPLETE THE INTERVIEW. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS ACREDIBLE RESPONDENT BUT HIS SECOND WIFE WHO STAYS WITH HIM IN THE SAME HOUSE REFUSED COMPLETELY FOR ME TO WRITE THE NAMES OF HER THREE CHILDREN THAT WHY THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN THE OLD MAN HAS IS 9 BUT THE NAMES GIVEN ARE 6 |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS AGGRESSIVE |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS AT FIRST DIFFICULT TO CONVINCE TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONNARE BUT LATER AGREED.GENNERALLY HE COMPLAINED OF NOT SEEING ANY BENEFIT FROM THE QUESTIONS.HE ALSO COMPLAINED THAT THE QUESTINNAIRE WAS TOO LONG O ANSWER.HE WINDED UP BY S |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS ATENTIVE AND EGER TO ANSWER QUESTIONS BUT WE HAD TO BREAK ALL THE TIME BECAUSE OF TIREDNESS. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS BORN IN 1952 .1955 WAS THE YEAR INDICATED IN THE NATIONAL IDENTITY CARD. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS BUSY SO HAD TO COME LATER TO COMPLETE THE INTERVIEW. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS CO-OPERATIVE ENOUGH BECAUSE I GOT HIM ALREADY LEAVING TO UP-COUNTRY BUT HE LEFT ME O INTERVIEW BEFORE HE LEFT. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS COMPLAINING VERY MUCH THT HE DOESNT SEE ANY HELP OF THIS INTERVIEW ,AND HE HAS BEEN INTERVIEWED A LOT OF TIMES. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS COOKING BY THE USE OF ONE HAND WHEN I ENTERED AS I DID THE INTERVIEW |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS COOPERATIVE AND READY FOR THE INTERVIEW. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS CURIOUS TO KNOW WHAT THE RESEARCH IS ALL ABOUT BUT AFTER EXPLAINING, HE ADMITTED TO BE INTERVIEWED |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS DIFFICULT TO HANDLE IN THE MIDDLE HE HAD TO DO HIS WORK AND SAID THAT IT WAS ONLY THAT HE RESPECTED MY WORK BUT HE WILL NEVER LET ANYBODY ASK HIM QUESTIONS BECAUSE WE ARE NOT HELPING HIM |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS DRUNK AND KEPT LAUGHING EVERTIME AND DANCING. THE RESPONDENT TOLD ME STORIES ABOUT HIS WIFE AND HIS FRIENDS WHEN I ASKED HIM WHAT KIND OF WORK HE DOES, HE TOLD ME THAT HIS WORK IS DRINKING |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS DRUNK BUT VERY COOPERATIVE. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS DRUNK. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS FAIR |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS FATIGUED BY THE INTERVIEW UNTILL. SHE WOULD LOOSE CONCENTRATION AND SEEMED ABSENT MINDED SINCE THE RESPONDNET WAS ELDERLY SHE COULDN'T UNDERSTAND SWAHILI THUS I HAD TO EXPLAIN EVERYTHING IN NATIVE LANGAUGE WHICH TOOK ME EVEN |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS FATIGUED BY THE QUESTIONNAIRE AND ON TOP OF IT WAS FROM WORK WHEN I WENT TO HIS PLACE |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS FETCHING WATER AS I CONDUCTED THE INTERVIEW THUS TOOK MUCH TIME |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS GO I MEET HIM WASHING AND HE EXECUESED ME FOR A WHILE WHICH I REALLY APPRECIATED OF HIM |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS GOOD AND WELCOMING TOO. HIS ACCURACY WAS AVERAGE. HE WAS SOME HOW SLOW - BUT NO PROBLEM IN UNDERSTANDING SWAHILI AND THE QUESTIONS IN GENERAL. I TOOK NORMAL TIME WITH HIM - IN QUESTIONNAIRE BOOK. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS GOOD BUT CONFESSED THAT ONLY AGREED TO BE INTERVIEWED BECAUSE MY APPROACH WAS GOOD AND THAT I AM VERY SOCIAL AND GOOD TO PEOPLE.-----COMMENT AFTER Q7.64-- THE INTERVIEW WAS INTERRUPTED AND THE RESPONDED SUGGESTED THAT I COME |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS GOOD GRATEFUL FOR MY VISIT HIS COMPREHENSION FOR ISSUES DISCUSSED WS AVERAGE. I JUST TOOK NORMAL TIME FOR INTERVIEW AS THE SITUATUION WAS A NORMAL ONE |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS GOOD. HE WAS GRATEFUL FOR MY VISIT FROM (APHRC) FOR SURVEY WHICH GIVES THE TRUE PICTURE OF WHAT KOROGOCHO IN ALL ASPECTS.- HE WAS VERY SLOW AND THATS WHY I TOOK MORE TIME THAN THE NORMAL WITH HIM, ALTHOUGH I DIDNT NEED A TRAN |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS HALF WAY BLIND |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS HESISTANT TO ANSWER AND WAS DRUNK BUT THE INTERVIEW WAS OKAY. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS HUMAROUS |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS INVOLVED IN A ACCIDENT 2 MONTHS AGO. HE WENT TO THE HOSPITAL BUTR WAS TOLD HE HAD NO INJURIES, HE WAS UNHURT BUT ROW AFTER 2 MONTHS IS WHEN HE IS FEELING UNWELL, BUT AT THE TIME OF ACCIDENT, HE SAYS HE ESCAPED WITH NOT EVEN A |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS LYING ON HIS BED DUE TO BODY ACHES AND WAS UNABLE TO SIT DOWN, I DID THE QUESTIONNAIRE ON HIS BED. THE RESPONDNET HAD MARRIED THE FIRST WIFE WHO GAVE BIRTH TO SIX KIDS AND DIVORCED HE WAS VERY MUCH HURT OF THE WIFE AND HE HA |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS NEGATIVE FROM THE START.. HE SAID THAT HE HAS NOT SEEN THE IMPACT OF THE RESEACH SINCE IT STARTED |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT AT EASE. I COULD NOTICE HE WAS UNCOMFORTABLE BUT AS THE INTERVIEW PROGRESSED HE BECAME COMFORTABLE AND FREE |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT READY TO DISCUSS THE CHILDREN |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT READY TO GIVE DETAILED INFORMATION ASKED AS SHE CLAIMED THAT SHE HAS BEEN ASKED THE SAME QUESTIONS. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT WILLIG TO ANSEW BUT I CONVINCED HIM AND HE ENDED UP ANSWERING |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS ONCE A BURSE AND SOMETIMES SHE ADVICE THE FEW WHO SEEK HER ATTENTION SHE ALSO ACTS AS MIDWIFRY FOR PAYMENTCT |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS POSITVE INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY UNDERSTANDING |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS QUITE COOPERATIVE AS HENEVER GAVE ME HARD TIME DURING THE INTERVIEW. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS QUITE STUBBORNAS HE INTERRUPTED THE INTERVIEW AND WENT TO THE SHOWER,CAME BACK AND CONTINUED AND AFTER A WHILE STEPPED OUT TO SEE A FRIEND, THEN CAME BACK. HE WOULD ASK QUESTIONS IN BETWEEN THE INTERVIEW AND GIVE STORIES ALMO |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS READY TO ANSWER ANYTHING. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS RECEPTIVE |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS SLOW TO UNDERSTANDING THE QUESTIONS SO THE DAUGHTER HAD TO INTERPRET WHERE SHE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND. SHE ALSO GOT BORED AND STARTED SAYING FOR HOW LONG CAN SHE ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS SO HARD THAT GETTING HE TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS WAS A PROBLEM. ALTHOUGH I DID THE INTERVIEW THR RESPONDENT WAS NOT AS SUCH CO-OPERATIVE. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS SO MUCH RECEPTIVE. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS SO RUDE AND ARROGANT AND HE NEVER WANTED TO TAKE THE INTERVIEW UNTIL THE NEIGHBOUR CONVINCED HIM TO,SO HE TOOK IT UMWILLINGLY AND SO IT WAS LIKE HIS TIME WAS BEING WASTED ON THINGS THAT WONT HELP HIM IN ANYWAY. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS TOO OLD AND WASN'T HAPPY ABOUT THE QUESTIONS SHE ONLY SPOKE HER MOTHER TONGUE AND IN THAT CASE USED HER GRANDCHILD TO INTERPRATE THE RESPONDENT HAS 8 CHILDREN TWO WHORM ARE DEAD AND SHE WONT SPEAK ABOUT THEM AND HAS GIVEN A |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY ACCURATE BECAUSE HE COULD REMEMBER ALL THE DATES OF BIRTH OF HIS CHILDREN WHICH MOST RESPONDENTS FIND IT DIFFICULT. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY CO-OPERATIVE BUT HE WAS COMPLAINING I HAVE WASTED ALOT OF HIS TIME. THE RESPONDENT DOES NOT GO TO THE MEETING OF THE MERRY GO ROUND INSTEAD HE SENDS HIS WIFE. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY CO-OPERATIVE. HE INSISTED ME TO TAKE HIS MOBILE NUMBER SO THAT IT WOULD BE EASY TO GET HIM IF I WILL BE IN NEED OF HIM. HE TOLD ME HE IS A REGISTERED RENOVATOR. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY COOPERATIVE |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY COOPERATIVE EVEN THOUGH HE WAS NOT SATISFIED WITH HIS WAY OF LIVING. I.E. LACK OF ENOUGH FUNDS FOR HIMSELF AND FAMILY. HE ASKED WHAT THE ORGANIZATION CAN DO TO HELP THE PEOPLE OF THE COMMUNITY |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY COOPERATIVE. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY DIFFICULT ONE AND HE EVEN ASKED WHY I HAD BEEN ASKING FOR HIM AND THAT IS EVEN WHY HE HAD MADE AN APPOINTMENT FOR ME TO COME AT SIX OCLOCK IN THE EVENING TO SEE WHETHER I COULD MAKE IT AT THAT TIME. HE WENT ON TO SAY THA |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY FRIENDLY AND READY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ASKED. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY FRIENDLY, WILLING TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AND VERY CO-OPERATIVE. INTERVIEW WAS GOOD |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY MUCH COOPERATIVE |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY MUCH COOPERATIVE HE TOLD ME THEY SEPARATED WITH THE FIRST WIFE AND SHE WENT WITH TWO CHILDREN |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY MUCH ENJOYING THE INTERVIEW |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY MUCH POSITIVE AS FAR AS THE INTERVIEW WAS CONCERNED |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY MUCH UNABLE TO GIVE EXACT DETAILS OF BIRTH MONTH |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY OLD AND NOT LEARNE.SHE DIDNT EVEN KNOW KISWAHILI I GOT A TRANSLATER.SHE GAVE ANSWERS TO HER LEVEL BEST ABOUT HIV HER COMPREHENSITION WAS BAD.SHE WAS CO OPERATIVE WELCOMING AND A COME AGAIN SHE WAS GRATEFUL FOR THE VISIT |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY OPEN AND EVEN ADMITTED THAT THE HUSBAND AND HER DEAD CHIDLREN DIED OF HIV/AIDS |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY STUBORN BECAUSE IT WAS AFTER A REFUSAL |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY STURBORN,SHE EVEN REFUSES TO ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY THANKFUL FOR SUCH KIND OF AN INTERVIEW MAY BE.HE THOUGHT THERE WOULD BE MORE HELP TO BE GRANTED. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY TIRED FROM WORK BUT FINALLY DECIDED TO COOPERATE AND TAKE THE INTERVIEW |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY UNCOOPERATIVE. HE ALMOST REFUSED BEING INTERVIEWES |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY UNDERSTANDNIGN AND WAS WILLING TO GIVE ALL THE INFORMATION NEEDED. SHE SAID THIS IS THE LONGEST QUESTIONNAIRE SHE HAS EVER ANSWERED |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS WILLING TO BE INTERVIEWED BUT LATER CHANGED MIND THAT LESS WAS BEING DONE. I HAD TO GO THE SECOND TIME TO FINISH THE INTERVIEW BUT I HAD TO TAKE ALOT OF TIME CONVINCING HER WITH THE DAUGHTER OF WHICH SHE AGREED |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS WILLING TO GIVE ALL THE INFORMATION REQUIRED |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS WILLING TO GIVE INFORMATION AND HELP WHERE NECESSARY BUT HE SAID WE SHOULD AT LEAST HELP THEM OR TELL THEM WHERE THEY CAN GET HELP BECAUSE THEY ARE SUFFERING |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS WILLING TO GIVE INFORMATION BUT TO SOME POINT SHE WAS KIND OF BORED. BUT LATER SHE PARTCIPATED WELL. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WENT HOME BUT HE DAD LEFT A MESSAGE THAT HE WILL COME EARLY DECEMBER. THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY MUCH INTERESTED IN THE INTERVIEW. |
|
THE RESPONDENT'S FEEDBACK WAS ACCURATE BECAUSE IN SECTION 6 HE'S EVEN TOLD ME OF THE DISEASES THAT HAVE NOT BEEN HIGHLIGHTED ON THE QUESTIONNAIRE LIKE LOW LIBIDO. |
|
THE RESPONDENT'S HUSBAND DIED ON A ROAD ACCIDENT ON JANUARY.SHE HAD NO OTHERWISE BUT TO START LOOKING FOR VIBARUA (WORK) SHE SAYS SHE IS HEALTHWISE OKEY. |
|
THE RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION FORM WAS NOT GIVEN BUT SH WAS WIFE TO JOHN WAINAINA KAMAU AND WAS OVER 50 YEARS |
|
THE RESPONDENT'S WIVES DO COME TO STAY WITH HIM FOR A NUMBER OF DAYS OR MONTHS AND SOMETIMES THEY ARE AWAY IN RURAL AREA (KITUI) |
|
THE RESPONDENTS FEEDBACK WAS ACCURATE. |
|
THE RESPONDENTS INDENTIFICATION FORM COULD NOT BE FOUND BUT HE SAYS HE HAS STAYED IN THIS LOCATION FOR LONG |
|
THE RESPONDENT’S ANSWERS SEEMED TO BE VERY ACCURATE EVEN THROUGH HIS FACIAL EXPRESSION AND THE TIME SHE TOOK ON EXPANDING A SINGLE THING. |
|
THE RESPONDNET COULD NOT REMEMBER |
|
THE RESPONDNET COULD UNDERSTAND SWAHILI TO SOME EXTENT AND COMMUNICATION WAS HARD |
|
THE RESPONDNET HER PROBLE OF CONCERNTRATION REALLY AFFECTS THE INTERVIEW E,G SHE TOLD ME THAT SHE HAVE TWO KIDS ALMOST THE MIDDLE SHE REMEMBERRED AND MANY OTHER QUESTIONS |
|
THE RESPONDNET TENDED TO REFUSE AND I TOOK ALOT OF TIME TO EXPLAINE AND THE ACCEPTED |
|
THE RESPONDNET WAS LYING ON HIS BEN DURING THE INTERVIEW DUE TO SWELLING OF HIS LEG AND SORE. THE AIDS EPIDEMIC SEEMED TO BE STRANGER TO HIM AND WAS RELACTAND TO ANSWER ME BACK BUT ALL IN ALL HE ANSWERED ME |
|
THE RESPONDNET WAS VERY UNCOPERATIVE. SHE REFUSED TO DISCLOSE THE NAMES OF ALL HER CHILDREN. SHE ONLY GAVE ONE NAME INSISTING THAT THE DSS GUYS KNOW EVERYTHING ABOPUT HER FAMILY |
|
THE RESPONDNET WS VERY MUCH ACCURATE IN REMEMBERING THE DATE MONTHS AND YEARS. ABOUT THE QUESTION CONCERNING HIV/AIDS IT WAS AS IF HE WAS FEARING HIS WIFE SO WE TOOK SOMETIME THERE. (UNTIL SHE WENT) |
|
THE RESPONENTS' YEAR OF BIRTH IS 1954. THE RESPOND SON KENNEDY, DAUGHTER CELINE AND GRANDDAUGHTER MERCY ALL STAY IN THE NEIGHBOURHOOD AND DOES ALL THINGS TOGETHER. HE CARED FOR HER DAUGHTER WHO WAS IN FOR 2 1/2 YEARS FROM 2002 TO APRIL 2004 THI |
|
THE RSPONDENT WAS CO-OPARETIVE |
|
THE TEAM LEADER CAN CROSS CHECK THE BIRTH YRS. |
|
THE WOMAN HAS ALOT OF PROBLEMS. SINCE SHE FELL ILL. THAT IS AFTER FALLING DOWN DUE TO THE STONES THAT WERE PUT ON THE ROADS. HER CHILDREN HAD TO DO SOME ODD SMALL BUSINESS AFTER SCHOOL LIKE SELLING FRUITS AND THE LIKE. THE WOMAN THOUGH COOPERAT |
|
THE YEAR OF BIRTH OF CHILDREN WAS A PROBLEM. ALSO A PROBLEM IN UNDERSTANDING KISWAHILI |
|
THERE ARE SITUATIONS WHERE BY A CHILD HAS ONE NAME THAT IS NOT BAPTISED. THE RESPONDNET GIVE ONLY ONE NAME |
|
THERE ARE SOME DOUBTFUL ANSWERSS WHICH NEED RECTIFICATION LIKE 11.5 AND 11.6 |
|
THERE MOTHER DOES NOT KNOW THE DATES OF BIRTH AND DATES FOR OTHER EVERNTS LIKE WHEN HE GOT MARRIED WHEN THEHUSBAND DIED. SHE HAS JUST GUESSED THE DATES |
|
THERE SHOULD BE A SKIP ON Q 8.41 TO 8.43 IS ANSWER IS YES IN Q 8.41 |
|
THIS INTERVIEW WAS DONE IN TWO DAYS |
|
THIS MAN SAY'S HAD 10 CHILDREN FIVE OF WHOM DIED SOME TIME BACK YE T HE GAVE FOUR NAMES OF DECEASED CHILDREN SAYING THAT HE COULDNT REMEMBER THE NAME OF THE FITH |
|
THIS OLD WOMAN DON'T UNDERSTAND KISWAHILI SO WELL BUT HIS SON CAME IN DURING THE INTERVIEW AND TRANSLATED THE QUESTION TO A LANGUAGE SHE UNDERSTANDS |
|
THIS PARTICULAR RESPONDENT COULD INLY KNOW THE YEARS HIS CHILD BORN AND NOT THE MONTHS. HE WAS VERY FRIENDLY DID WASTE TIME A TOOK A BRIEF. EASE (NORNOL TIME WITH HIM BEFORE AND IN THE INTERVIEW. ALTHOUGH IT WAS NOT EASY TO GET HIM BECAUSE MAN |
|
THIS PARTICULAR RESPONDENT REFUSED TO GIVE OUT HIS CHILDREN MANES. WAS REALY HARD TO CONVINCE HIM INTO TAKING PART IN THIS . Q4.4 HE DIDN'T HAVE ANY RESPONSE TO THIS |
|
THIS PARTICULAR RESPONDENT WAS VERY GOOD AND VERY GRATFUL FOR ME TO VIST AND KNOW HER PROBLEMS. ESPECIALLY ABOUT HIS CHILD WHO WAS ILL FOR ABOUT SIX GOOD YEARS. WHERE BY SGE GOT VERY ROUGH TIME WITH HER. I TOOK AN AMPLE TIME WITH HER BECAUSE S |
|
THIS REPONDENT WAS INTIALLY SIO HARD TO INTERVIEW. HE MADE ME LISTEN TO HIS LONG STORIES ABOUT THE MAUMAU AND SUCH BUT HE FINALLY GAVE ME SOME GREEN LIGHT |
|
THIS RESPONDENT HAS BEEN SICK FOR LONG. I FOUND HIM AT HOME THREE CONSECUTIVE DAYS BUT HE KEPT CALLING ME NAMES. HE AGREED TO BE INTERVIEWED WHEN HIS WIFE WAS INTERVIEWED |
|
THIS RESPONDENT IS CONFUSSED |
|
THIS RESPONDENT WAS SO BITTER ABOUT APHRC SAYING THAT IT ONLY COLLECTS IN INFORMATION TO GAIN FOR MONEY FOR THE CENTER AND THE RESIDENTS DONT BENEFIT |
|
THIS WAS THE BEST INTERVIEW I EVER CARRIED BECAUSE THE RESPONDENT ALREADY WHAT WE WE TO DO EVEN BEFORE WE START DOING. HE APPRECIATED APRHC IS DOING A VERY EXCELLENT WORK. |
|
THIS WOMAN CLAIMS HER HUSBAND IS MARRIED TO TWO WIVEWS BUT LATER ON WHEN I TALK TO THE HUSBAND HE SAYS HE ONLY RECOGNISES THE SECOND WIFE AS THE ONLY WIFE. HE WAS DRUNK. |
|
THOUGH RESPONDENT LIVES IN THE HOUSEHOLD, SHE DOESNT LIVE HERE EVERYDAY. SHE LIVES IN MAKUENI THEIR RURAL HOME WHERE SHE IS A FARMER. HER SON WHO IS CALLED JOSEPH WAS INJURED IN A ROAD ACCIDENT AND BROKE LEG AND SUSTAINED HEAD INJURIES. SO HE H |
|
THOUGH THE RESPONDENT WAS AVAILABLE THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE SUCCESFULY. |
|
TO SAME EXTENT THE RESPONDENT COULD NOT GIVE THE ACTUAL DATES AND MONTHS |
|
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND ASSESSMENT. |
|
TOOK MORE TIME ON THE VIGNETES OTHERWISE HE WAS WELCOMING |
|
TOOK MORE TIME ON VIGNETTE PART. MADE THE RESPONDENT FIRST UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION BEFORE AN ANSWER WAS GIVEN |
|
TOOK NORMAL TIME FOR THE QUESTIONARE PART.TOOK MORE TIME WITH THE VIGNETTE NEEDED TIME TO UNDERSTAND,GOT NO PROBLEM WITH HIM CONVERSANT WITH SWAHILI LANGUAGE ,FAST LEARNER,NO LEARNING OR UNDERSTANDING PROBLEMDUE TO OLD AGE.GRATEFUL FOR MY VISIT |
|
TOOK NORMAL TIME WITH THE QUESTIONAIRE BUT TOOK MORE TIME WITH THE VIGETTE PART AS IT WAS VERY HARD FOR HIM TO UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION BEFORE GIVING OUT AN ANSWER |
|
TWO OF HER DAUGHTERS ARE STAYING WITH HER AND THEY BOTH HAVE CHILDREN. ONE OF THE DAUGHTES IS HIV POSTIVE. ALSO HER SON IS MARRIED AND HAS A CHILD BUT SHE IS THE ONE TAKING CARE OF HER. |
|
USED ARTFICIAL LIMBS ACCOMPANIED BY STICK |
|
VERY OLD HE DID NOT KNOW KISWAHILI. GOT ASSISTANCE FROM SOMEBODY TO INTERVIEW HER |
|
VERY OLD NOT VERY MUCH CONVERSANT WITH KISWAHILI. SHE TOOK ALOT OF TIME TELLING ME ABOUT OTHER THINGS AND I WS PATIENT BECAUSE IT IS NECESARY TOGET HER OR ALL HER ATTENTIONS. SHE WAS VERY MUCH GRATEFUL FOR ME TO VISIT HER AND KNOW ALL HER PRO |
|
VERY SLOW, TOOK MORE TIME WITH HIM. HE WAS COOPERATIVE |
|
VERY WELCOMING |
|
VERY WELCOMING, TOOK NORMAL TIME WITH HER (QUESTIONNAIRE), BUT FOR THE VIGNETTE PART- TOOK MORE TIME |
|
VERY WELCOMING,SHE COMPLAINED THE QUESTIONARE WAS LONG,HAVE ATLEAST 70 TO 80% ATTENTION TO TEH COMMUNITY THEY WILL BE VERY GRATEFUL AND EVERYTHING WILL GO ALRIGHT |
|
VERY WELCOMINGUNDERSTOOD SWAHILI AND RESPONDED TO ALL QUESTION WELLTOOK SOME TIME ON THE VIGNETTE THAN ON THE QUESTIONAIRE |
|
VERY WELLCOMING |
|
WAS A DIFFICULT RESPONDENT. SHE REFUSED TO TALK ABOUT HER DEAD CHILDREN AND GIVE THEIR NAMES. SHE HAD CARED FOR SICK PERSON BUT THAT WAS 5 YRS AGO |
|
WAS BORN IN 1957 BUT NOT IN 1940 |
|
WAS POSITIVE BUT WAS RELUCTANT TO GIVE INFORMATION BECAUSE SHE WAS OF OPINION THAT INFORMATION WAS COLLECTED LONG AGO |
|
WAS THANKFUL AND WELCOMING |
|
WAS WELCOMING AND GRATEFUL FOR MY VISIT. HE ALSO HE STATED WHY HE ACCEPTS TO GIVE ME INFORMATION AND WAS HAPPY SEEING ME WORKING INSTEAD OF DOING ILLEGAL WORK |
|
WAS WELLCOMING. NO COMMUNICATION BARRIER AND THEY TOOK NORMAL TIME |
|
WE ALMOST TOOK 0 MINUTES TALKING BEFORE THE INTERVIEW (HE WAS SOMEHOW RELUCTANT) I HAD TO BE PATIENT TO GET HIS ATTENTION. HE LATER ACCEPTED BUT THEN HE WAS BUSY TALKING WITH PEOPLE(PESSERBY) AT THE SOMETIMES GIVING ATTENTIONS |
|
WE ARE ASKING TOO MANY QUESTIONS HOPE THEY WILL BENEFIT. HE WAS WILLING TO GIVE FULL INFORMATION BECAUSE HE HAD REMOVED WHERE HE WROTE. HE WAS TALKING TOO MUCH WHICH ARE IRRELEVANT TO WHAT I WAS ASKING SO I HAD TO BE SLOW |
|
WE HAD TO DO IT SLOWLY FOR HER TO UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE LINES BECAUSE SHE WAS A SOMALIAN |
|
WE HAVE BEEN ASKING TOO MANY QUESITIONS OF LATE MAY BE THEY WILL GET HELP SOON |
|
WELCOMING, TOOK MORE TIME WITH THE VIGNETTE TOOK TIME TO UNDERSTAND IT |
|
WELCOMING,TOOK NORMAL TIME (QUESTIONNAIRE), AS FOR THE VIGNETTE PART TOOK MORE TIME, HE NEEDS TIME TO UNDERSTAND AND GIVE ANSWERS |
|
WELCOMING. TOOK MORE TIME ON THE VIGNETTES |
|
WELCOMING. HE UNDERSTOOD THAT THE RESEARCH WAS TO DO WITH HIM BUT TOOK TIME URGING THE ORGANISATION TO GIVE OUT GOOD HELP (HEALTH - FREE HEALTH) AN EXTENSIVE ONE ESPECIALLY TO ASSIST THOSE WEAK AND WITH COMLEX PROBLEMS |
|
WELCOMING. NO LANGUAGE BARRIER |
|
WHEN I ASKED THE RESPONDENT ABOUT HIS CHILDREN SHE FOUND IT DIFFICULT AND STARTED SOBBING. THEN SHE TOLD ME THAT THE HAS TWO GRANDCHILDREN WOM SHE CALLS HER OWN. THE CHILDREN PASSED ON |
|
WHEN I STARTED ASKING QUESTIONS ON HEALTH CARE RESPONDENT WAS A BIT RESISTANT THEN AFTER A FEW QUESTIONS HE ACTUALLY CONFESSED THAT HE UNDERSTOOD WHY I WAS ASKING AND EVEN ASSURED ME THAT HE WAS NOT SICK TO ME HE WAS NOT HIV POSITIVE. I CLARIFI |
|
WILLING TO GIVE INFORMATION |
|
WILLING TO GIVE INFORMATION AND SAID THAT HE IS NOT LEARNED TO KNOW WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE BORN |
|
WILLING TO GIVE INFORMATION BUT SAID THAT WE ASK TOO MANY QUESTIONS AND NOT HELPING THEM |
|
WORK HISTORY AND BENEFIT. THE FIRST QUESTION SHE HAD ANSWERED THAT SHE DONT WORK UPON REACHING QUESTION 5.16. SHE TOLD ME THAT SHE CULTIVATE FOR HER OWN FOOD . THUS I HAD TO ASK AGAIN THE FIRST QUESTION |
|
YES - THE QUESION O N VIGNETTES WERE SO TWISTING DIFFICULT ALTHUGH HE MANAGED TO ATTEND ALL - TOOK MORE TIME HERE |
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.